ECONEWS SERVICE
FEATURES:
Current Exopolitics News
Environmental War Desk
Extraterrestrials & the Environment
UniverseBooks.com
peaceinspace.com
WASHINGTON E.T.
EcoNews Articles
Strategic Deception Desk
 
Update # 1
Update # 2
Update # 3
Update # 4

STRATEGIC DECEPTION DESK

FREE WILL & A FREE MIND ARE THE BULWARKS OF PERSONAL LIBERTY

Caveat Lector -  We do not endorse this information,
but pass it on in the public interest.
EcoNews Service, Vancouver, BC

QUERY:Who is the Beneficiary from all this?



911 NEWS & ANALYSIS:

            http://www.centrexnews.com/
           http://www.emperors-clothes.com/
           http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
           http://www.rense.com
           http://www.copvcia.com
           http://www.Public-Action.com
           http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/
           http://daastol.com/EurasianGreatGame/
           http://chicago.indymedia.org



Robert Sterling
 Editor, The Konformist
 http://www.konformist.com

 Jim Marrs
 jmarrs@ntws.net
 9/13/2001

   WHO'S TRULY BEHIND THE ATTACK ON AMERICA?

   Many people have compared the horrendous terrorist attack on New
 York's World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington to the
 attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. It is an apt comparison, though not
 for the reasons most people think.

    For true students of history, it is now nearly beyond dispute that
 certain high-ranking officials in Washington, D. C. knew in advance
 of the Japanese intention to attack the U.S. fleet in Hawaii, yet did
 nothing to prevent it.

   President Roosevelt, who at the time was blatantly violating the
 Neutrality Act, has been quoted as saying, "A Japanese attack on
 us.would certainly fulfill two of the most important requirements of
 our policy [to engage America in the war despite his pledge to keep
 us out of war.]"

   Must the citizens of the United States wait another 50 years to
 learn that the 9-11 terrorist attack was allowed to take place just
 like Pearl Harbor?

   Could such an appalling scenario possibly be true?

   Consider the comment of Kenneth Katzman, a terrorist expert with the

   Congressional Research Service, who told the Washington Post, "How
 nothing could have been picked up [by U.S. intelligence agencies
 regarding the coming attack] is beyond me."

   Simple countermeasures against such an attack now seem apparent. For
 example, if the airlines would assigned just one armed plainclothes
 security man to each flight, this tragedy may have been averted since
 apparently the hijackers were armed only with knives or other type
 blades. So, how were they able to overpower a plane load of people
 and, more importantly, gain access to the cockpits? Who taught them
 to fly jumbo jets?

   As in the case of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy,
 the key to understanding the event lies not in who actually committed
 the violence but rather who was able to strip away the normal
 security protection.

   Government and airline officials knew immediately that planes had
 been hijacked, yet no interceptors appeared in the air until after
 the attacks were completed. Who stripped away the normal security
 protection of America on 9-11?

   At least in this most recent case, the government cannot blame the
 attack on a lone deranged individual, some Lee Harvey McVeigh. They
 must deal with a full-blown conspiracy, even though authorities were
 quick to point the finger at Osama bin-Laden. Any investigation of
 bin-Laden must look beyond the man, to the backers and financiers
 behind him.

   The trail of the terrorists will most probably become murky, with
 plenty of accusations for all concerned. But one thing appears quite
 clear, the tragic events of 9-11 play right into the hands of persons
 with an agenda aimed at eroding American liberties and sovereignty.

   After decades of bloated and misused defense budgets, there are now
 calls for doubling our defense allocation. In a time of rising
 recognition that the CIA is an agency never sought by the public and
 one which has brought so much condemnation on this nation, there are
 now cries for doubling its size and budget. If the chief security
 officer for a large company fails to protect one of its most prized
 assets, is he more likely to be fired or have his pay doubled?

   Watch for more anti-terrorist legislation to further shred the U.S.
 Constitution.

   As we all scramble to deal with the effects of terrorism, are we in
 danger of losing our few remaining individual liberties? The media
 blithely reported that each of the cell phone calls made by doomed
 passengers on the hijacked airliners was recorded by the government.
 Doesn't this mean that all cell phone calls are, or can be, recorded?
 Whatever happened to telephone privacy? Where is the indignant outcry
 over such Big Brotherism.

   But the biggest threat comes from the inner elite of the globalist
 societies. Within hours of the attack, the television and radio
 airwaves were full of ranking Council on Foreign Relations members,
 such as Henry Kissinger, Wesley Clark, Alexander Haig and Strobe
 Talbot. Talbot, President Clinton's deputy secretary of state, told
 Time magazine in 1992, "In the next century [today], nations as we
 know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global
 authority."

   No matter who was speaking, their "party line" was the same:
 terrible tragedy, find and punish those responsible, stop terrorism.
 But, of course, since terrorists move between national boundaries, we
 must joined with other "freedom loving" nations and work with the
 United Nations and NATO to combat this new menace. This is a thinly-
 disguised effort to have a mourning and emotional American public
 stampeded into their New World Order.

   Also, consider that we are distracted from a faltering economy [the
 current crisis may require more federal financial controls], a
 plummeting public opinion of George W. Bush and surging energy prices.

   Would leaders allow a public disaster to happen with an eye toward
 advancing their agendas? It's happened before. in Nero's burning
 Rome, Germany's gutted Reichstag, at Pearl Harbor and gain at the
 Gulf of Tonkin.

   While we should grieve for our losses, we must keep our heads. When
 the emotions of the moment run hot, we must remain cool and
 thoughtful so that we can find who is truly behind this attack on
 America.





Who Is Osama Bin Laden?
by Michel Chossudovsky
Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa

Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), Montréal
Posted 12 September 2001

A few hours after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the
Pentagon, the Bush administration concluded without supporting evidence,
that "Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda organisation were prime suspects".
CIA Director George Tenet stated that bin Laden has the capacity to plan
``multiple attacks with little or no warning.'' Secretary of State Colin
Powell called the attacks "an act of war" and President Bush confirmed in an
evening televised address to the Nation that he would "make no distinction
between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them".
Former CIA Director James Woolsey pointed his finger at "state sponsorship,"
implying the complicity of one or more foreign governments. In the words of
former National Security Adviser, Lawrence Eagleburger, "I think we will
show when we get attacked like this, we are terrible in our strength and in
our retribution."

Meanwhile, parroting official statements, the Western media mantra has
approved the launching of "punitive actions" directed against civilian
targets in the Middle East. In the words of William Saffire writing in the
New York Times: "When we reasonably determine our attackers' bases and
camps, we must pulverize them -- minimizing but accepting the risk of
collateral damage" -- and act overtly or covertly to destabilize terror's
national hosts".

The following text outlines the history of Osama Bin Laden and the links of
the Islamic "Jihad" to the formulation of US foreign policy during the Cold
War and its aftermath.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Prime suspect in the New York and Washington terrorists attacks, branded by
the FBI as an "international terrorist" for his role in the African US
embassy bombings, Saudi born Osama bin Laden was recruited during the
Soviet-Afghan war "ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet
invaders". 1

In 1979 "the largest covert operation in the history of the CIA" was
launched in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in support of the
pro-Communist government of Babrak Kamal.2:

With the active encouragement of the CIA and Pakistan's ISI [Inter Services
Intelligence], who wanted to turn the Afghan jihad into a global war waged
by all Muslim states against the Soviet Union, some 35,000 Muslim radicals
from 40 Islamic countries joined Afghanistan's fight between 1982 and 1992.
Tens of thousands more came to study in Pakistani madrasahs. Eventually more
than 100,000 foreign Muslim radicals were directly influenced by the Afghan
jihad.3

The Islamic "jihad" was supported by the United States and Saudi Arabia with
a significant part of the funding generated from the Golden Crescent drug
trade:

In March 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive
166,...[which] authorize[d] stepped-up covert military aid to the
mujahideen, and it made clear that the secret Afghan war had a new goal: to
defeat Soviet troops in Afghanistan through covert action and encourage a
Soviet withdrawal. The new covert U.S. assistance began with a dramatic
increase in arms supplies -- a steady rise to 65,000 tons annually by 1987,
... as well as a "ceaseless stream" of CIA and Pentagon specialists who
traveled to the secret headquarters of Pakistan's ISI on the main road near
Rawalpindi, Pakistan. There the CIA specialists met with Pakistani
intelligence officers to help plan operations for the Afghan rebels.4
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) using Pakistan's military
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) played a key role in training the
Mujahideen. In turn, the CIA sponsored guerrilla training was integrated
with the teachings of Islam:

Predominant themes were that Islam was a complete socio-political ideology,
that holy Islam was being violated by the atheistic Soviet troops, and that
the Islamic people of Afghanistan should reassert their independence by
overthrowing the leftist Afghan regime propped up by Moscow.5

Pakistan's Intelligence Apparatus

Pakistan's ISI was used as a "go-between". The CIA covert support to the
"jihad" operated indirectly through the Pakistani ISI, --i.e. the CIA did
not channel its support directly to the Mujahideen. In other words, for
these covert operations to be "successful", Washington was careful not to
reveal the ultimate objective of the "jihad", which consisted in destroying
the Soviet Union.

In the words of CIA's Milton Beardman "We didn't train Arabs". Yet according
to Abdel Monam Saidali, of the Al-aram Center for Strategic Studies in
Cairo, bin Laden and the "Afghan Arabs" had been imparted "with very
sophisticated types of training that was allowed to them by the CIA" 6

CIA's Beardman confirmed, in this regard, that Osama bin Laden was not aware
of the role he was playing on behalf of Washington. In the words of bin
Laden (quoted by Beardman): "neither I, nor my brothers saw evidence of
American help". 7

Motivated by nationalism and religious fervor, the Islamic warriors were
unaware that they were fighting the Soviet Army on behalf of Uncle Sam.
While there were contacts at the upper levels of the intelligence hierarchy,
Islamic rebel leaders in theatre had no contacts with Washington or the CIA.

With CIA backing and the funneling of massive amounts of US military aid,
the Pakistani ISI had developed into a "parallel structure wielding enormous
power over all aspects of government". 8 The ISI had a staff composed of
military and intelligence officers, bureaucrats, undercover agents and
informers, estimated at 150,000. 9

Meanwhile, CIA operations had also reinforced the Pakistani military regime
led by General Zia Ul Haq:

'Relations between the CIA and the ISI [Pakistan's military intelligence]
had grown increasingly warm following [General] Zia's ouster of Bhutto and
the advent of the military regime,'... During most of the Afghan war,
Pakistan was more aggressively anti-Soviet than even the United States. Soon
after the Soviet military invaded Afghanistan in 1980, Zia [ul Haq] sent his
ISI chief to destabilize the Soviet Central Asian states. The CIA only
agreed to this plan in October 1984.... `the CIA was more cautious than the
Pakistanis.' Both Pakistan and the United States took the line of deception
on Afghanistan with a public posture of negotiating a settlement while
privately agreeing that military escalation was the best course.10

The Golden Crescent Drug Triangle

The history of the drug trade in Central Asia is intimately related to the
CIA's covert operations. Prior to the Soviet-Afghan war, opium production in
Afghanistan and Pakistan was directed to small regional markets. There was
no local production of heroin. 11 In this regard, Alfred McCoy's study
confirms that within two years of the onslaught of the CIA operation in
Afghanistan, "the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world's top
heroin producer, supplying 60 percent of U.S. demand. In Pakistan, the
heroin-addict population went from near zero in 1979... to 1.2 million by
1985 -- a much steeper rise than in any other nation":12

CIA assets again controlled this heroin trade. As the Mujahideen guerrillas
seized territory inside Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to plant opium as
a revolutionary tax. Across the border in Pakistan, Afghan leaders and local
syndicates under the protection of Pakistan Intelligence operated hundreds
of heroin laboratories. During this decade of wide-open drug-dealing, the
U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency in Islamabad failed to instigate major seizures
or arrests ... U.S. officials had refused to investigate charges of heroin
dealing by its Afghan allies `because U.S. narcotics policy in Afghanistan
has been subordinated to the war against Soviet influence there.' In 1995,
the former CIA director of the Afghan operation, Charles Cogan, admitted the
CIA had indeed sacrificed the drug war to fight the Cold War. `Our main
mission was to do as much damage as possible to the Soviets. We didn't
really have the resources or the time to devote to an investigation of the
drug trade,'... `I don't think that we need to apologize for this. Every
situation has its fallout.... There was fallout in terms of drugs, yes. But
the main objective was accomplished. The Soviets left Afghanistan.'13

In the Wake of the Cold War

In the wake of the Cold War, the Central Asian region is not only strategic
for its extensive oil reserves, it also produces three quarters of the
World's opium representing multibillion dollar revenues to business
syndicates, financial institutions, intelligence agencies and organized
crime. The annual proceeds of the Golden Crescent drug trade (between 100
and 200 billion dollars) represents approximately one third of the Worldwide
annual turnover of narcotics, estimated by the United Nations to be of the
order of $500 billion.14

With the disintegration of the Soviet Union, a new surge in opium production
has unfolded. (According to UN estimates, the production of opium in
Afghanistan in 1998-99 -- coinciding with the build up of armed insurgencies
in the former Soviet republics-- reached a record high of 4600 metric
tons.15 Powerful business syndicates in the former Soviet Union allied with
organized crime are competing for the strategic control over the heroin
routes.

The ISI's extensive intelligence military-network was not dismantled in the
wake of the Cold War. The CIA continued to support the Islamic "jihad" out
of Pakistan. New undercover initiatives were set in motion in Central Asia,
the Caucasus and the Balkans. Pakistan's military and intelligence apparatus
essentially "served as a catalyst for the disintegration of the Soviet Union
and the emergence of six new Muslim republics in Central Asia." 16.

Meanwhile, Islamic missionaries of the Wahhabi sect from Saudi Arabia had
established themselves in the Muslim republics as well as within the Russian
federation encroaching upon the institutions of the secular State. Despite
its anti-American ideology, Islamic fundamentalism was largely serving
Washington's strategic interests in the former Soviet Union.

Following the withdrawal of Soviet troops in 1989, the civil war in
Afghanistan continued unabated. The Taliban were being supported by the
Pakistani Deobandis and their political party the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam
(JUI). In 1993, JUI entered the government coalition of Prime Minister
Benazzir Bhutto. Ties between JUI, the Army and ISI were established. In
1995, with the downfall of the Hezb-I-Islami Hektmatyar government in Kabul,
the Taliban not only instated a hardline Islamic government, they also
"handed control of training camps in Afghanistan over to JUI factions..." 17

And the JUI with the support of the Saudi Wahhabi movements played a key
role in recruiting volunteers to fight in the Balkans and the former Soviet
Union.

Jane Defense Weekly confirms in this regard that "half of Taliban manpower
and equipment originate[d] in Pakistan under the ISI" 18

In fact, it would appear that following the Soviet withdrawal both sides in
the Afghan civil war continued to receive covert support through Pakistan's
ISI. 19

In other words, backed by Pakistan's military intelligence (ISI) which in
turn was controlled by the CIA, the Taliban Islamic State was largely
serving American geopolitical interests. The Golden Crescent drug trade was
also being used to finance and equip the Bosnian Muslim Army (starting in
the early 1990s) and the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). In last few months
there is evidence that Mujahideen mercenaries are fighting in the ranks of
KLA-NLA terrorists in their assaults into Macedonia.

No doubt, this explains why Washington has closed its eyes on the reign of
terror imposed by the Taliban including the blatant derogation of women's
rights, the closing down of schools for girls, the dismissal of women
employees from government offices and the enforcement of "the Sharia laws of
punishment".20

The War in Chechnya

With regard to Chechnya, the main rebel leaders Shamil Basayev and Al
Khattab were trained and indoctrinated in CIA sponsored camps in Afghanistan
and Pakistan. According to Yossef Bodansky, director of the U.S. Congress's
Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, the war in Chechnya had
been planned during a secret summit of HizbAllah International held in 1996
in Mogadishu, Somalia. 21 The summit, was attended by Osama bin Laden and
high-ranking Iranian and Pakistani intelligence officers. In this regard,
the involvement of Pakistan's ISI in Chechnya "goes far beyond supplying the
Chechens with weapons and expertise: the ISI and its radical Islamic proxies
are actually calling the shots in this war". 22

Russia's main pipeline route transits through Chechnya and Dagestan. Despite
Washington's perfunctory condemnation of Islamic terrorism, the indirect
beneficiaries of the Chechen war are the Anglo-American oil conglomerates
which are vying for control over oil resources and pipeline corridors out of
the Caspian Sea basin.

The two main Chechen rebel armies (respectively led by Commander Shamil
Basayev and Emir Khattab) estimated at 35,000 strong were supported by
Pakistan's ISI, which also played a key role in organizing and training the
Chechen rebel army:

[In 1994] the Pakistani Inter Services Intelligence arranged for Basayev and
his trusted lieutenants to undergo intensive Islamic indoctrination and
training in guerrilla warfare in the Khost province of Afghanistan at Amir
Muawia camp, set up in the early 1980s by the CIA and ISI and run by famous
Afghani warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. In July 1994, upon graduating from Amir
Muawia, Basayev was transferred to Markaz-i-Dawar camp in Pakistan to
undergo training in advanced guerrilla tactics. In Pakistan, Basayev met the
highest ranking Pakistani military and intelligence officers: Minister of
Defense General Aftab Shahban Mirani, Minister of Interior General
Naserullah Babar, and the head of the ISI branch in charge of supporting
Islamic causes, General Javed Ashraf, (all now retired). High-level
connections soon proved very useful to Basayev.23

Following his training and indoctrination stint, Basayev was assigned to
lead the assault against Russian federal troops in the first Chechen war in
1995. His organization had also developed extensive links to criminal
syndicates in Moscow as well as ties to Albanian organized crime and the
Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). In 1997-98, according to Russia's Federal
Security Service (FSB) "Chechen warlords started buying up real estate in
Kosovo... through several real estate firms registered as a cover in
Yugoslavia" 24

Basayev's organisation has also been involved in a number of rackets
including narcotics, illegal tapping and sabotage of Russia's oil pipelines,
kidnapping, prostitution, trade in counterfeit dollars and the smuggling of
nuclear materials (See Mafia linked to Albania's collapsed pyramids, 25
Alongside the extensive laundering of drug money, the proceeds of various
illicit activities have been funneled towards the recruitment of mercenaries
and the purchase of weapons.

During his training in Afghanistan, Shamil Basayev linked up with Saudi born
veteran Mujahideen Commander "Al Khattab" who had fought as a volunteer in
Afghanistan. Barely a few months after Basayev's return to Grozny, Khattab
was invited (early 1995) to set up an army base in Chechnya for the training
of Mujahideen fighters. According to the BBC, Khattab's posting to Chechnya
had been "arranged through the Saudi-Arabian based [International] Islamic
Relief Organisation, a militant religious organisation, funded by mosques
and rich individuals which channeled funds into Chechnya".26

Concluding Remarks

Since the Cold War era, Washington has consciously supported Osama bin
Laden, while at same time placing him on the FBI's "most wanted list" as the
World's foremost terrorist.

While the Mujahideen are busy fighting America's war in the Balkans and the
former Soviet Union, the FBI --operating as a US based Police Force- is
waging a domestic war against terrorism, operating in some respects
independently of the CIA which has --since the Soviet-Afghan war-- supported
international terrorism through its covert operations.

In a cruel irony, while the Islamic jihad --featured by the Bush
Adminstration as "a threat to America"-- is blamed for the terrorist
assaults on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, these same Islamic
organisations constitute a key instrument of US military-intelligence
operations in the Balkans and the former Soviet Union.

In the wake of the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, the truth
must prevail to prevent the Bush Adminstration together with its NATO
partners from embarking upon a military adventure which threatens the future
of humanity.

The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html

Copyright Michel Chossudovsky, Montreal, September 2001. All rights
reserved. Permission is granted to post this text on non-commercial
community internet sites, provided the source and the URL are indicated, the
essay remains intact and the copyright note is displayed. To publish this
text in printed and/or other forms, including commercial internet sites and
excerpts, contact the author at chossudovsky@videotron.ca, fax:
1-514-4256224.



 NY Times Confirms Air Defense FAA Coverup
Date: 15/09/01 1:10:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time

The New York Times has published an article confirming the air defense
problems tragically illustrated by Tuesday's acts of war against this
country, and confirming that the FAA was well aware that airliners had been
hijacked PRIOR to the crashes into the World Trade Center towers and the
Pentagon but fighters were not scrambled in time for some reason.  See this
link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/15/national/15CONT.html

The article reveals that "The Federal Aviation Administration has officially
REFUSED TO DISCUSS ... the SEQUENCE OF EVENTS on Tuesday morning, saying
these are part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's inquiry."

WHAT????  You mean that 10,000 of our citizens can be slaughtered in
coldblood and the FAA can REFUSE TO DISCUSS EVEN WHAT HAPPENED?????

This is absolutely contemptible.  This is the response of a bunch of
CRIMINALS TAKING THE 5th.

At what level of carnage would the FAA finally relent and DISCUSS THE
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS leading to the carnage?  Would it take 100,000 dead?  How
about 1 million dead?  Would maybe at 70 million dead -- one-fourth of the
U.S. population -- as in a nuclear war, would the FAA finally relent and
DISCUSS THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS that led to such a holocaust?????

The article goes on to discuss the military-civilian system of air traffic
control set up in the 50's (I had traced it to 1952 via ADC histories in
researching the UFO air defense issue).  It claims these are "provisions for
close communications between civilian [FAA] and military [NORAD] traffic
officials."  But it looks to me like the 1950's system of minute-by-minute
coordination between CAA/FAA and ADC/NORAD of air traffic information to
identify all flights has broken down.  There doesn't seem to be a continuous
flow of instantaneous electronic air traffic data to NORAD.  Instead, someone
at FAA, a human, has to DECIDE to notify NORAD.  The data apparently (I don't
_know_ for sure) doesn't automatically appear on NORAD display screens.  Or
if it does, NORAD doesn't task computers to track and pay attention to air
target data unless and until the FAA singles out traffic for attention.

The excuse that this was unprecedented, they were taken by surprise, didn't
know what to do about civilian airliners hijacked as weapons of war, etc., is
just POPPYCOCK.  Ever heard of Pearl Harbor????  It was UNPRECEDENTED, a
SURPRISE, an ACT of WAR.  Later in the war we had SUICIDE KAMIKAZE bombers.
The CIA was set up in 1947 to warn against and to prevent future Pearl
Harbors.  The rules of engagement for fighter interception of Unidentified
Targets, as we've seen from UFO incidents, has never been so EFFETE and
CONFUSED.

If the target was behaving peculiarly or entered a Restricted Zone (remember
the Washington National Airport UFO incidents of July 1952?) the targets were
INTERCEPTED.  At the very least fighters could have pinpointed the airliners,
followed their headings and alerted ahead where the airliners seemed to be
going, especially American Flight 77 which reportedly flew around the White
House and the Capitol prior to plunging into the Pentagon.

In the Wash Nat UFO incidents we saw there was a delay in scrambling fighters
because the runway at Andrews AFB was closed for repairs and the F-94's had
to come from Dover AFB in Delaware over 100 miles away.  Has NO ONE IN AIR
DEFENSE LEARNED ANY LESSONS from 1952????  I thought they had and that in
part at least it was recognized that the comprehensive system of CAA-ADC
communication was going to solve such problems, though in 1952 it was
realized that it would take a few years before the system would be fully up
and running.  And THAT was in the days before computers and satellites.  What
excuse do we have today?
 
 



-Caveat Lector-

 Aftershocks
 http://www.counterpunch.org/

 by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St.Clair

 Least credible news footage

 CNN's videotape of Palestinians supposedly  dancing in
 the streets of a West Bank town.   CounterPuncher
 Marcio A.V. Carvalho at the  state university of
 Campinas in Brazil tells us that he and his colleagues
 had compared this tape with one from 1991 showing
 Palestinian cheering, and found them to be identical.

 Prudy



The Stern-Intel News Alert

http://www.mystae.com/sternintel/index.html

NOTE: EcoNews Service received the following item via email on September 13, 2001 from a friend who had received it as an email.  Its original provenance is unknown.  The item may bear many of the hallmarks of covert intentional disinformation; conversely parts of the item may be accurate.  Its originating agency is unknown. The person forwarding EcoNews Service the item stated, "it came from a pakistani source." The item is posted here for research purposes only.  Thank you.

Send reply to:   "Omer Bin Abdullah" <obasahab@yahoo.com>
From:            "Omer Bin Abdullah" <obasahab@yahoo.com>
To:              <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
Subject:         NEWS EMBARGO AFTER ISRAELI LINK LEAK
Date sent:       Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:05:25 -0400

NEWS EMBARGO AFTER ISRAELI LINK LEAK

Stern-Intel (Canada). A US military intelligence source revealed details of an internal intelligence memo that points to the Israeli Mossad intelligence service having links to the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. The intelligence source, who requested his name be withheld, confirmed the internal US intelligence memo circulated four weeks ago described information that pointed to the threat of a covert Israeli operation on US 
soil to turn mass public opinion against Palestinian Arabs via an apparent terrorist attack on US interests that would give Israel the green light to implement a large scale military onslaught against the Palestinian Arab population.
The 11 September attack has been described by experts as being too sophisticated for a lone terrorist group to execute. "This attack required a high level of military precision and the resources of  an advanced 
intelligence agency. In addition, the attackers would have needed to be extremely  familiar with both air force one flight operations, civil airline flight paths and aerial assault tactics on sensitive US cities like 
Washington, Stated David Stern an expert on Israeli intelligence operations. The attacks targeted the Pentagon, World Trade Center towers, with the White House and Air Force One also being targets according to the FBI.
"The attacks have certainly turned US public opinion firmly back in Israel's favor after 11 months of Palestinian uprising, heavy criticism of Israel over war crimes allegations and racism by a UN conference in Durban. The attacks serve no Arab group or nation's interests but their timing came in the midst of international condemnation of Israel for its policy of death squad assassination of Palestinian political and police figures", added Stern.
If verified, the news of Israel's involvement in the US attack will come as no surprise to intelligence experts. The state of Israel has a long history of covert operations against Western targets with attacks on the King David Hotel, USS Liberty, murder of a Scandinavian UN envoy as well as espionage against the US during the Jonathan Pollard case.
On Wednesday the US defense department issued a warning to its officials to halt the leak of information on the investigation which it says is happening on a daily basis since the attacks occurred.
 
 





LETTER TO THE EDITOR

From:            "EcoNews Service" <econews@ecologynews.com>
To:              "Jimmy & Debbie" <xxxx@hot.rr.com>
Date sent:       Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:03:12 -0700
Subject:         Re: bull!!!!
Send reply to:   econews@ecologynews.com
Priority:        normal

Hi! Thanks for writing. Free will and a free mind are still the bulwark 
of freedom.

CAVEAT LECTOR: Here are more fragments suggesting "attack" 
may be a strategic deception.

Washington was 'warned of hijack risk'
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=9019

BIN LADEN & HIS CIA CONNECTIONS COME HOME TO ROOST 
— Michael Moran
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html

Somebody knew what was coming!
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=8933

THEY KNEW! And now WE KNOW THEY KNEW!!
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=9059

Call from US Carrier PROVES gov't had prior knowledge!!
 [ -- Go to: info@inforadionet.com
 http://www.inforadionet.com/
 then select UNWO to HEAR THE CALL!]

(Real Audio) - About 10 min. into bcst...
http://www.soundwaves2000.com/media/unwotoday.ram



BIN LADEN & HIS CIA CONNECTIONS COME 
HOME TO ROOST

[Note that the date on this story is August 1998, by MSNBC's International
Editor]

Bin Laden comes home to roost His CIA ties are only the beginning of a
woeful story

By Michael Moran MSNBC
http://msnbc.com/news/190144.asp?cp1=1

NEW YORK, Aug. 24, 1998 -  At the CIA, it happens often enough to have a
code name: Blowback. Simply defined, this is the term that describes an
agent, an operative or an operation that has turned on its creators. Osama
bin Laden, our new public enemy Number 1, is the personification of
blowback. And the fact that he is viewed as a hero by millions in the
Islamic world proves again the old adage: Reap what you sow.

BEFORE YOU CLICK on my face and call me naive, let me concede some points.
Yes, the West needed Josef Stalin to defeat Hitler. Yes, there were times
during the Cold War when supporting one villain (Cambodia's Lon Nol, for
instance) would have been better than the alternative (Pol Pot). So yes,
there are times when any nation must hold its nose and shake hands with the
devil for the long-term good of the planet.

But just as surely, there are times when the United States, faced
with such moral dilemmas, should have resisted the temptation to act. Arming
a multi- national coalition of Islamic extremists in
Afghanistan during the 1980s - well after the destruction of the
Marine barracks in Beirut or the hijacking of TWA Flight 847 - was
one of those times.

BIN LADEN'S BEGINNINGS

As anyone who has bothered to read this far certainly knows by now, bin
Laden is the heir to Saudi construction fortune who, at least
since the early 1990s, has used that money to finance countless
attacks on U.S. interests and those of its Arab allies around the
world.

Osama bin Laden's network

As his unclassified CIA biography states, bin Laden left Saudi Arabia
to fight the Soviet army in Afghanistan after Moscow's invasion in
1979. By 1984, he was running a front organization known as Maktab
al-Khidamar - the MAK - which funneled money, arms and fighters from the
outside world into the Afghan war.

What the CIA bio conveniently fails to specify (in its unclassified
form, at least) is that the MAK was nurtured by Pakistan's state
security services, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI,
the CIA's primary conduit for conducting the covert war against
Moscow's occupation.

By no means was Osama bin Laden the leader of Afghanistan's
mujahedeen. His money gave him undue prominence in the Afghan
struggle, but the vast majority of those who fought and died for
Afghanistan's freedom - like the Taliban regime that now holds sway
over most of that tortured nation - were Afghan nationals.

Yet the CIA, concerned about the factionalism of Afghanistan made
famous by Rudyard Kipling, found that Arab zealots who flocked to aid the
Afghans were easier to "read" than the rivalry-ridden natives.
While the Arab volunteers might well prove troublesome later, the
agency reasoned, they at least were one-dimensionally anti-Soviet for now.
So bin Laden, along with a small group of Islamic militants from Egypt,
Pakistan, Lebanon, Syria and Palestinian refugee camps all over the Middle
East, became the "reliable" partners of the CIA in its war against Moscow.

WHAT'S 'INTELLIGENT' ABOUT THIS?

Though he has come to represent all that went wrong with the CIA's
reckless strategy there, by the end of the Afghan war in 1989, bin
Laden was still viewed by the agency as something of a dilettante - a rich
Saudi boy gone to war and welcomed home by the Saudi monarchy he so hated as
something of a hero.

 America strikes back

In fact, while he returned to his family's construction business, bin
Laden had split from the relatively conventional MAK in 1988 and
established a new group, al-Qaida, that included many of the more
extreme MAK members he had met in Afghanistan.

Most of these Afghan vets, or Afghanis, as the Arabs who fought there became
known, turned up later behind violent Islamic movements around the world.
Among them: the GIA in Algeria, thought responsible for the massacres of
tens of thousands of civilians; Egypt's Gamat Ismalia, which has massacred
western tourists repeatedly in recent years; Saudi Arabia Shiite militants,
responsible for the Khobar Towers and Riyadh bombings of 1996.

Indeed, to this day, those involved in the decision to give the
Afghan rebels access to a fortune in covert funding and top-level
combat weaponry continue to defend that move in the context of the
Cold War. Sen. Orrin Hatch, a senior Republican on the Senate
Intelligence Committee making those decisions, told my colleague
Robert Windrem that he would make the same call again today even
knowing what bin Laden would do subsequently. "It was worth it," he
said.

"Those were very important, pivotal matters that played an important role in
the downfall of the Soviet Union," he said.

HINDSIGHT OR TUNNEL VISION

It should be pointed out that the evidence of bin Laden's connection
to these activities is mostly classified, though its hard to imagine
the CIA rushing to take credit for a Frankenstein's monster like
this.

It is also worth acknowledging that it is easier now to oppose the
CIA's Afghan adventures than it was when Hatch and company made them in the
mid-1980s. After all, in 1998 we now know that far larger elements than
Afghanistan were corroding the communist party's grip on power in Moscow.

Even Hatch can't be blamed completely. The CIA, ever mindful of the need to
justify its "mission," had conclusive evidence by the
mid-1980s of the deepening crisis of infrastructure within the Soviet
Union. The CIA, as its deputy director William Gates acknowledged
under congressional questioning in 1992, had decided to keep that
evidence from President Reagan and his top advisors and instead
continued to grossly exaggerate Soviet military and technological
capabilities in its annual "Soviet Military Power" report right up to
1990.

Given that context, a decision was made to provide America's
potential enemies with the arms, money - and most importantly - the
knowledge of how to run a war of attrition violent and well-organized
enough to humble a superpower.

That decision is coming home to roost.
[Michael Moran is MSNBC's International Editor]

Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 90083
Gainesville, FL. 32607
(352) 337-9274
http://www.space4peace.org
globalnet@mindspring.com



 FBI ADMITS FOURTH PLANE MAY HAVE BEEN SHOT DOWN
 Date:  13/09/01 7:39:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time

 http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=11511

 From Rumor Mill News Read Only Forum

 THE FOURTH PLANE IS THE KEY! ! - FBI RETRACTS

 Posted By: PsyOpNews
 Date: Thursday, 13 September 2001, 3:24 p.m.

 THE FOURTH PLANE IS THE KEY!! - FBI RETRACTS

 STOP PRESS: FBI ADMITS FOURTH PLANE
 MAY HAVE BEEN SHOT DOWN
 

[http://us.news2.yimg.com/f/42/31/7m/dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/2
0010913/ts/atta

ck
 _pennsylvania_dc_3.html]

 What a turnaround! This is starting to unravel.
 The first retraction of the official version of events.
 The fourth plane holds the key to it all.

 QUESTION: WHERE WAS THAT PLANE GOING?
 -BEFORE AND AFTER IT'S U-TURN.
 QUESTION: WAS IT SHOT DOWN FOR ABORTING THE 
MISSION?
 Watch this space.....

 EARLIER ON http://www.psyopnews.com

 EYEWITNESSES SAW
 UNMARKED PLANE AT
 FLIGHT 93 CRASH MORE
ʉۢ WAS FOURTH PLANE SHOT DOWN?
 http://eionews.addr.com/psyops/fourthplane.htm

 13th September, 2001
 At least four witnesses who were at the crash scene within five 
minutes of the  crash told local WTAE-TV's Paul Van Osdol that they saw AN 
UNMARKED plane in the area. Video of these interviews is posted online but currently inaccessible.

 LATEST DEVELOPMENTS - CLICK BELOW
 http://psyopnews.com/



Caveat Lector:
  ________________________________________________
       A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
             http://www.ainfos.ca/
  ________________________________________________

 The news will never report this!!

From: www.indymedia.orgm and: www.counterpunch.org

FINANCIERS WARNED! Congress left in the dark about WTC foreknowledge (english)        by relayed from counterpunch 4:06am Fri Sep 14 '01 
 

           lots of stuff, MOSTLY THAT FINANCIERS WERE WARNED! and
 Congress left in the dark. Internal memo to Goldman Sachs distributed on
 SEPTEMBER 10 2001 warning emminent terrorism. Wonder why all the big
 CEOs they have been reporting were conveniently "out of the office" in the
 WTC that day? Talk about private and corrupt power, and Congresspeople
 are saying this. 

       By Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair 
       CounterPunch.org 
       9-14-1 

       * Most revealing reaction 

       Benyamin Netanyahu, former Israeli prime minister, on being asked
 what the attack means for relations between the US and Israel: "It's very
 good." 

       * Least credible analysis

       New York Times columnist William Safire, claiming there was a terrorist
 mole in the White House, relaying to the kamikaze pilots the whereabouts of
 the President and the special coordinates of Air Force One. Safire's political
 mission in that particular column was to explain why the President fled
 down a SAC bunker in Nebraska. * Least credible news footage 

       CNN's videotape of Palestinians supposedly dancing in the streets of a
 West Bank town. CounterPuncher Marcio A.V. Carvalho at the state
 university of Campinas in Brazil tells us that he and his colleagues had
 compared this tape with one from 1991 showing Palestinian cheering, and
 found them to be identical. [a claim--though Canadian news footage shows
 mourning Arabs; U.S. media shows happy, celebrating Arabs. You put the
 pieces together on who is the enemy: THE U.S CORPORATE MEDIA!] 

       America's Greens Rally to Flag, Run for Cover 

       Hot to present themselves as staunch flag-waggers, some of America's
 premier environmental organizations have disgracefully ditched their
 principles. 

       The Sierra Club, America's oldest green group has abruptly turned off its
 campaign against the anti-environmental program of the Bush
 administration. CounterPunch has secured an internal memo in which the
 club's high command explains to its staff why it suspending its campaigns.
 "In response to the attacks on America," the memo goes, "we are shifting
 our communications strategy for the immediate future. We have taken all of
 our ads off of the air; halted our phone banks; removed any material from
 the web that people could perceive as anti-Bush, and we are taking other
 steps to prevent the Sierra Club from being perceived as controversial
 during this crisis. For now we are going to stop aggressively pushing our
 agenda and will cease bashing President Bush " 

       The memo then instructs club staffers on how to respond to the press:
 "If you are asked about what this terrorism does to the Sierra Club's agenda,
 please respond simply by saying that right now the public needs to focus on
 comforting each other and strengthening our national security to deal with
 the crisis at hand." 

       Imagine if this craven posture spreads across the public interest
 movement. We could expect First Amendment defenders to say that they
 were abandoning efforts to protect the Bill of Rights. We could expect
 groups defending immigrants to say that henceforth the INS should be given
 free rein. Fortunately First Amendment defenders and defenders of
 immigrants have stronger spines and principles than the supposed
 defenders of the environment at the Sierra Club. Are we now to expect the
 Club to endorse drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve as necessary
 "for national security"? 

       Even groups that we here at CounterPunch have admired are now in
 pellmell cowardly retreat. 

       The Berkeley-based International Rivers Network, which has been the
 main bulwark against the Three Gorges dam in China, now announces that
 it is suspending its planned nationwide protest against Morgan Stanley, one
 of the dam's principle financiers. Morgan Stanley had 50 floors of offices in
 the World Trade Center. IRN has also announced that "out of respect for the
 victims of this disaster, with understanding of the strategic difficulties in
 conveying to a shocked media and public our messages regarding the
 World Bank and IMF, with concern for the integrity of security systems in
 Washington DC, and for the safety of all, we will refrain from participating in
 activities surrounding the planned World Bank / IMF this month. We are also
 sharing our concerns with the leading organizations responsible for planning
 and coordinating these activities." 

       The Ruckus Society, the direct action training group involved in many
 demonstrations at the World Trade Organization has simultaneously
 announced that it is canceling its training camp, to be held in Middleburgh,
 Virginia, scheduled as preparation for the next World Bank meeting. This
 camp was to be cosponsored by the Institute for Policy Studies, Jobs with
 Justice and Global Exchange. All these organizations have now backed out,
 saying that now is not the time for such activity. 

       The Rainforest Action Network, based in San Francisco, has called for
 the cancellation of the protest and said that in the event it goes forward it
 will not participate. 

       Let's get this straight. If all resisters to the Bush political program were
 to follow this shameful exhibition by these green groups, we would see
 peace groups declining to protest against nuclear attacks on Iraq and armed
 invasion of Afghanistan. We would see civil rights sitting on their hands as
 racial and religious profiling is used to persecute people of Middle Eastern
 descent. Defenders of Palestinian rights would say that for the time being
 they wouldn't protest the use of US Apache helicopters against civilians in
 West Bank towns and villages. What nonsense! Principles are never more
 important than when it is inconvenient or dangerous to stand up for them. 

       Big Oil's Kamikaze 

       Rep. Don Young, the wild man from Alaska, was one of the few
 members of congress who didn't completely buy into the notion of Osama
 bin Laden as the mastermind of the attacks on the World Trade complex
 and the Pentagon. There's some possibility, Young told the Alaska Daily
 News, that the attacks are linked to the protests against the World Trade
 Organization, another of which is scheduled for later this month in
 Washington D.C. "If you watched what happened (at past protests) in
 Genoa, in Italy, and even in Seattle, there's some expertise in that field,"
 Young said. "I'm not sure they're that dedicated but ecoterrorists --which are
 really based in Seattle -- there's a strong possibility that could be one of the
 groups." 

       Young doesn't believe any of this. But he smells weakness in the
 environmental movement and, like the old fur-trapper that he is, he is poised
 to exploit it. Young is not beneath using the carnage of the World Trade
 Center as a launching ground for his own agenda: oil drilling in the Arctic
 Wildlife Refuge, logging in the Tongass rainforest, passing laws against
 environmental protest and construction of new missile bases in the Alaska
 tundra and on the Aleutian Islands. 

       Chemical War in Manhattan As the environmentalists are putting
 themselves into a state of suspended animation, the citizens of Manhattan
 and the thousands of volunteer rescue workers mulling through the rubble at
 the World Trade Center complex may well be in the whirlwind of a toxic
 event, which has received little media attention and almost no precautionary
 aid from FEMA or other federal agencies coordinating. 

       Early reports from the Environmental Protection Agency described the
 destruction of the World Trade complex "an environmental catastrophe": the
 air of Manhattan clotted with asbestos, dioxin and other poisons. Yet,
 rescue workers found themselves without little more than surgical masks
 between their lungs and the poisons emanating from the smoldering ruins. 

       For years, the Pentagon and other terror pundits had been warning of
 the vulnerability of American cities to attack by biological and chemical
 weapons, the so-called asymmetrical warfare. These apocalyptic scenarios
 held that terrorist groups would unleash anthrax or sarin gas attacks in
 subways, water supplies or mega-office buildings, such as the World Trade
 Towers. Well, it turns out that the attackers didn't need to pack any
 chemicals, the buildings themselves proved to be quite toxic enough. The
 attackers used American planes as missiles and the buildings as chemical
 weapons. 

       Built during the height of the asbestos boom, the guts of the World
 Trade Center may have been one of the world's largest repositories of the
 carcinogenic fiber, used as insulation in the giant towers. 

       Underneath the rubble, thousands of tires continue to burn, sending
 plumes of pitch black smoke down the canyons of Manhattan. This smoke
 is contaminated with dioxins and assorted other poisons of the
 petrochemical age. 

       Early Warnings 

       Reports keep coming in to us of advanced warnings that an attack of
 some sort was eminent. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown was booked to
 fly from the Bay Area to New York City on the morning of September 11. But
 Brown says that late Monday evening, a full 8 hours prior to the attack, he
 received a call from a person Brown described as his "airport security man"
 telling him that he should be extra cautious about air travel on September
 11. 

       In addition to what we have previously reported about heightened
 security at the World Trade Center itself in the weeks leading to the attack
 and at the Picatinny Arsenal in Rockaway, New Jersey, CounterPunch has
 also learned that an internal memo was sent around Goldman Sachs in
 Tokyo on September 10 advising all employees of a possible terrorist
 attack. It recommended all employees to avoid any American government
 buildings. 

       That said, according to Rep. David Bonior, the Michigan Democrat, the
 Congress was the last to know. Even after two planes had struck the World
 Trade Center towers and another had smashed into the Pentagon, Bonior
 says congressional officials were not warned by the CIA or any other
 intelligence arm of the federal government that the 30,000 workers in the
 Capitol might be at risk of an attack. Bonoir has been one of the few
 members of Congress to openly question the value of bowing to the
 demands for more money made by CIA and other intelligence agencies. "If
 they can't even warn members of Congress about an ongoing attack, you
 really have to wonder what good they are," Bonior said. CP
 

    ********
        ****** The A-Infos News Service ******
       News about and of interest to anarchists
                        ******
   COMMANDS: lists@ainfos.ca
   REPLIES: a-infos-d@ainfos.ca
   HELP: a-infos-org@ainfos.ca
   WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca/
   INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org



Caveat Lector:
Skolnick - US Government Had Prior Knowledge Of Emergency
By Sherman H. Skolnick
skolnick@ameritech.net http://www.skolnicksreport.com

America's Reichstag Fire

The most massive so-called "terrorist" attacks on U.S. soil since the
Oklahoma City bombings of 1995, were known, a week ahead of time, by the
American CIA. Among the foreign intelligence agencies who penetrated the
plots were the French CIA and Israel's The Mossad, units of both often
working with one another.
 

Foreign intelligence sources confirm the validity of this story. And they
state that they informed the U.S. secret police who absolutely failed,
neglected, and outright refused to take action as to known prior specifics
of which the top-level of the CIA were informed in advance.
 

As made known to the CIA, were the following, among other details:
 

[1] That George Herbert Walker Bush, as President, at the close of the
Persian Gulf War, 1991, arranged to bring into the U.S. some four thousand
Iraqi military officers, some from intelligence units, and their families.
 

[2] Some 550 of these officers became residents in Lincoln, Nebraska, AND
TWO THOUSAND OF THEM took up residence in Oklahoma City. In a watered down
story, CBS' "60 Minutes" Program did a segment once on this about Lincoln,
Nebraska but said NOTHING about the Iraqi military officers in Oklahoma
City.
 

[3] The financial and other provisions for them and their families were
arranged by the Elder Bush, and then quietly continued by Bill Clinton as
President, and perpetuated by George W. Bush as White House "resident" and
"occupant". The arrangements included financial subsidies, housing, and
employment for the Iraqi officers.
 

[A brave Oklahoma City TV Reporter, Jayna Davis, on their local TV station,
put on the air several stories about the Iraqi connection to the bombing of
the Alfred P. Murrah Building, the bombing done with the aid of domestic
dissidents as surrogates. A group bought out the TV station and silenced
her. Timothy McVeigh's chief defense counsel for the murder trial, Stephen
Jones, on behalf of McVeigh, filed an extra-ordinary petition in the next
higher court, just prior to the murder trial. To no avail, Jones tried to
force Denver U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch to compel the American CIA
to disgorge records held by them showing prior U.S. knowledge of the
bombing, as confirmed by other known records, some of them also in secret
court records. We have a copy of the 185 page U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th
Circuit, petition filed by Jones and almost uniformly ignored by the
American monopoly press. The petition raises the Iraqi connection.]
 

[4] The foreign intelligence agencies informed the American CIA that guns
would be planted on-board as many as ten U.S. commercial airflights. This to
be done by airplane clean-up crew members who are generally not subject to
airport security provisions. These workers most likely did not know the
purpose of the gun-planting.
 

[5] The CIA also was informed prior to the "terrorist" attacks scheduled for
"911" Emergency Day [September 11], that highly skilled Iraqi pilots, among
the four thousand Iraqi officers resident in the U.S., would take over the
commercial flights, by retrieving the weapons concealed onboard, and then
commandeering the flight deck.
 

[6] The Elder Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush, all were in a position to
know that the Iraqi officers that they provided for included some
double-agents. The FBI Counter-Intelligence Division at no time was
instructed to do anything about these double-agents in a position to commit
mischief, murder, and mayhem, on U.S. soil.
 

[7] As I revealed a week prior to the "terrorist" attacks, some foreign
television networks were busy preparing lengthy documentaries that would
scandalize George W. Bush and other members of the Bush Family, including
the Elder Bush and Jeb Bush. The subject matter included how forty million
dollars in dope funds were used by the Bush Family to reportedly corrupt
South Florida DEMOCRATS to abandon the recount even ahead of the U.S.
Supreme Court ruling installing George W. Bush as the "resident" and
"occupant" of the White House. The dope funds came reportedly from Bush
Family business partner, Carlos Lehder, co-founder of the U.S./Colombia
medellin dope cartel. [Visit our website story, "Chandra Levy Affair, Part
Two".] I discussed this on radio talk shows.
 

[8] As part of the targetting of the World Trade Center buildings, a group
of surrogates for the Iraqi military officers, reportedly spent considerable
time within one of the buildings, with building security officers somehow
oblivious of their presence.
 

[9] As the CIA top officials were informed and had prior knowledge, the
purpose of the "terrorist" attacks was to effectively paralyze the financial
infrastructure of the U.S. Some of the most important stock and bond houses
in the world, with their key people having loads of inside knowledge and
hard to replace trading tricks and expertise, were located in the
known-to-be-targetted twin towers of the World Trade Center, New York City.
It was like blowing up the main "financial factory" and destroying their
inventory. The so-called "back-up" records kept parked across the river in
New Jersey, are not only inadequate but cannot help reconstruct various
accounts and transactions in the works.
 

Financial experts tell us the "back up" records parked in New Jersey, may
NOT be sufficient to re-start the American financial apparatus. Some of the
experts are loudly grumbling that they should have early on seen Federal
Reserve Czar Alan Greenspan on the television explaining about the financial
ramifications. Of course, some suppose that Americans would panic and run
out of control. So we are dealt with like little children.
 

[10] It is a serious mistake, according to savvy American and foreign
intelligence sources, to blame the Emergency all on Osama bin Laden. As
readers of our website are aware, we have long pointed out that bin Laden is
reportedly in the Mid-East Construction business. His reputed partners? The
family of Sharon PERCY Rockefeller. She is the wife of John D. Rockefeller
4th (D., W.Va.), great grandson of the founder of the infamous Standard Oil
Trust that used to bomb their own obsolete buildings to falsely blame onto
their competitors. Bin Laden's so-called "secret" accounts, which the White
House has said they would like to freeze, are or have been actually
reportedly in the Harris Bank, Chicago, joint accounts with the family of
Sharon PERCY Rockefeller.
 

[11] The Saudi Royal Family actually consists of some five thousand members,
some of whom actually are for the U.S. and some anti-U.S. Some of them have
bankrolled Iraq's war against Iran, 1980 to 1988, to destroy some oil
facilities and keep the price of oil HIGH. The foreign intelligence
agencies, that penetrated the plots to be carried out on U.S. soil, are
aware that some of the Saudi royals are actually sympathetic to the Iraqis
destroying the World Trade Center Buildings and in part, wrecking the
Pentagon. [As if the American CIA did not ALREADY have their own knowledge
of this.]
 

Whenever there is a political assassination or some other unusual violent
event, what is the key question the oil-soaked, spy-riddled monopoly press
ALWAYS fails to ask? WHO BENEFITS. With a scandal about to break against
George W. Bush, he and his circle had an interest NOT to stop these things
from happening. And to divert attention. The White House has a strong motive
to silence critics and urge people TO RALLY AROUND THE PRESIDENT.
Simple-minded folks, of course, often poorly informed,do not understand how
the ruling classes would shed the blood of thousands if not millions of
innocent people, in some instigated war, to avoid dealing with the apparent
on-coming economic disasters.
 

In the midst of this prior-knowledge emergency, who dares now to point to
the Bush Family as reputed business partners of the major kingpin, Carlos
Lehder, of the U.S./Colombia medellin dope cartel? Or how huge dope money
bought the Electoral College trick in Florida and corrupted the U.S. Supreme
Court's "gang of five".
 

This is America's REICHSTAG fire. Adolph Hitler burned down the German
parliament and falsely blamed his enemies and had them rounded up and put in
the concentration camps. Has the U.S. Constitution now been revoked? More
coming.

Stay tuned.



http://www.online.ie/news/latest_world/viewer.adp?article=1512332

German police confirm Iranian deportee phoned warnings
 online.ie 14 Sep 2001
 

German police have confirmed an Iranian man phoned US police from his
deportation cell to warn of the planned attack on the World Trade Centre.The
Lower Saxony Justice Ministry has confirmed the man warned of the impending
series of terrorist attacks, but had not been believed.Spokesman Frank
Woesthoff said the man phoned America "several times", but refused to give
further details.He said the US Secret Service had not told the ministry about
the calls received from the Langenhagen prison until after the attacks."I
cannot say anything about the man and the ministry does not know the content
of the conversations," he added.The Hanover daily newspaper Neue Presse
reported the 29-year-old was dismissed as mentally unstable when he gave the
warning of a terrorist attack to occur this week.The ministry would not
reveal when the calls had been made.
 
 



Caveat Lector-

THEY KNEW! And now WE KNOW THEY KNEW!!
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=9059

** EXTREMELY URGENT **
 PLEASE FORWARD AS FAR AND WIDE AS POSSIBLE
 (send to ALL members of Congress)

 9.13.01
 Call from US Carrier PROVES gov't had prior knowledge!!

 [ -- Go to: info@inforadionet.com
 http://www.inforadionet.com/
 then select UNWO to HEAR THE CALL!]

(Real Audio) - About 10 min. into bcst...
http://www.soundwaves2000.com/media/unwotoday.ram

 A U.S. Navy serviceman stationed on an aircraft carrier called his
 family in the United States well PRIOR to Tuesday's horrendously
 catastrophic events in New York City and  at the Pentagon, and ALERTED
 THEM that "something big" was about to go down in a major urban area!

 Even MORE astounding: This person further noted that the carrier was
 being diverted from its previous mission and was heading directly to the
 East Coast as a result of the incident that was going to occur!

 Beyond the merest shadow of a doubt this proves conclusively that
 elements of the U.S. government's intelligence and military sectors HAD
 PRIOR KNOWLEDGE that a massive act of terrorism/war was about to be
 unleashed against America!

 THEY KNEW! And now WE KNOW THEY KNEW!!

 What's more: given the fact that according to information made public in
 the New York times on Oct. 28, 1993 it is PROVEN one FBI agent John
 Anticev and bureau associates were HEAVILY involved with Islamic
 extremists in EVERY STAGE of the bombing of the World trade Center in
 1993, providing funds, equipment, supplies, support and training to the
 actual perpetrators, we have EVERY REASON to believe the same state of
 affairs exists regarding Tuesday's mass atrocities in NYC and D.C.

 The Bush Administration and the globalist/NWO factions it's fronting for
 NEEDED a massive, earthshaking act of terrorism unleashed upon a major
 U.S. metropolitan area, in order to generate and galvanize support among
 the people for implementation of martial law conditions within the
 territory of the United States, and DRASTIC, SEVERE curtailment of
 Constitutional rights and civil liberties.

 The destruction, death and devastation wrought in New York and D.C.
 Tuesday are in EVERY WAY the BushMob's "burning of the Reichstag."

 Feds KNEW what was coming -- and what's more, certain factions clearly
 assisted, aided and abetted the actual perpetrators of Tuesday's mass
 carnage.

 AGAIN: We now have solid proof, with regard to the content of the call
 made by the Navy serviceman to his parents BEFORE Tuesday's events
 unfolded, that some elements of the federal government KNEW BEFOREHAND a
 major terrorist incident was going to occur!

 The Bush Administration must be turned out NOW. They are in EVERY WAY
 RESPONSIBLE!

======================================================================

Washington was 'warned of hijack risk'
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=9019

BIN LADEN & HIS CIA CONNECTIONS COME HOME TO ROOST — Michael Moran
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html

Somebody knew what was coming!
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=8933


        Bush's Press Conference: Into the Abyss 
                 by Rick Rozoff
                 [Posted 12 September 2001] 
                     http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/rozoff/abyss.htm 
                 [Mr. Rozoff is an editor of Emperor's Clothes] 
                 ======================================= 
                 As many of you have, I just watched US President
                 Bush's White House press conference on yesterday's
                 gruesome events in New York City and Washington, D.C. 
                 Bush and the United States federal government have
                 officially declared war...only it is not evident
                 against whom. 
                 Subsequent reports indicate that Bush will appear
                 before the U.S. Congress to invoke the War Powers Act,
                 passed by the House in the 1970s to limit a
                 president's ability to wage war unilaterally and
                 arbitrarily, but destroyed as an effective mechanism
                 for doing so in April of 1999 when the Clinton
                 Administration, for the first time in US history, was
                 denied authorization to continue a war - against
                 Yugoslavia - in a 213-213 vote in the Congress. Within
                 an hour of that vote a Clinton National Security
                 Council spokesman was on national television shrieking
                 that not only would the bombing not stop, but that it
                 would be intensified. 
                 By the US Congress accepting that crude diktat and
                 nevertheless appropriating funding for the
                 continuation of the illegal war, it definitively
                 signalled the end of the US Constitutional role of
                 America's formal representatives to oversee and rein
                 in the chief executive - half a president, half a
                 monarch - in future acts of illegal miitary actions
                 and aggression abroad. 
                 It appears that each successive American
                 administration pushes yet further the boundaries of
                 armed adventurism and catastrophe. 
                 As all the news commentators assure us, Bush will
                 receive near-unanimous carte blanche authorization to
                 wage war whenever, wherever and against whomever he
                 finds it expedient to do so. 
                 The US Congress, Republicans and Democrats,
                 conservatives and liberals, avowed war hawks and
                 alleged Progressive Caucus members, will grant him
                 whatever he requests: The funds and support to attack
                 any country or countries, even those not even remotely
                 implicated in yesterday's attacks, and the use of
                 whatever weaponry, conventional and otherwise, he
                 should choose to employ. 
                 What in fact Mr. Bush will soon be armed with - by
                 that assemblage of professional politicians on the
                 Hill who yesterday evening broke into a spontaneous
                 chorus of God Bless America, right out of the closing
                 scene of the revanchist Hollywood film, The Deer
                 Hunter - is an unlimited, permanent blank check to
                 wage la guerre eternal - war without end. 
                 The White House, with none of the fictitious foreign
                 policy fissures we've heard so much about, and its
                 diehard loyalists on both sides of the Congressional
                 aisle, have been evoking the specter of Osama bin
                 Laden to rally hateful and revengeful public sentiment
                 and to personify the oft-repeated *evil* that
                 threatens the United States and, to quote the
                 president, "all democratic and freedom-loving people"
                 - no other of whom, it should be noted, seems to be on
                 the alleged hit list of Mr. bin Laden. 
                 Furthermore, and ominously, Bush threatens not only to
                 attack - recall this is in his words a state of war -
                 the actual perpetrators of yesterday's attacks
                 (whomever they may be), but "their harbors." Not those
                 who allegedly harbor them, but their harbors. 
                 To be consistent, which is to say honest, Bush, as his
                 legion of intelligence operatives could readily tell
                 him, would have to identify who has and still is
                 supporting the villain of this dangerous melodrama,
                 Osama bin Laden. 
                 Bin Laden worked hand in glove with the US Central
                 Intelligence Agency since the early 1980s in
                 establishing his Maktab al-Khidamar network, which
                 raised money and recruited jehadis - the so-called
                 Afghan Arabs, estimated to be some 10,000 strong - to
                 overthrow the secular Democratic Republic of
                 Afghanistan. 
                 He was a joint asset of the CIA and Pakistan's
                 Inter-Service Intelligence, which the Afghan Northern
                 Opposition, Russia and India insist still supports and
                 controls him and his current Al-Qaida operation. The
                 latter is supported by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the
                 United Arab Emirates...all three loyal US and British
                 clients regimes and recipients of Anglo-American
                 military protection and largesse. So if Bush is
                 looking for harbors to bomb, he knows where they are
                 located. 
                 He also knows where they are not. 
                 And where and who they are not are the likely targets:
                 Iraq, Syria, Libya and Iran. 
                 All four are not only not linked to bin Laden in any
                 conceivable manner, but instead are vocal opponents of
                 him and his activities; are in fact potential victims
                 of the same. 
                 An audio voice-over somehow got on an American
                 television network yesterday that said: Bin Laden, who
                 has assisted forces in Somalia, Bosnia, Chechnya and
                 Kosovo.... 
                 The link has never been broken, of course, and the
                 CIA's Frankenstein monster still serves its purposes. 
                 Further Reading: 
                 1) While Washington points to Osama bin Laden as
                 "suspect # 1" in yesterday's horrific violence, the
                 truth is not being told to the American people:
                 'Washington Created Osama bin Laden' by Jared Israel
                 can be read at
                 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/sudan.html#w

                 2) If one looks carefully, one can find in the Western
                 media evidence that bin Laden has been involved - on
                 the U.S.-backed side - in Kosovo, Bosnia and now
                 Macedonia. 
                 3) Bin Laden was propelled into power as part of the
                 U.S. drive to create an Islamist terrorist movement to
                 crush the former Soviet Union. See, the truly amazing
                 account from the 'Washington Post,' 'Washington's
                 Backing of Afghan Terrorists: Deliberate Policy.' at 
                 http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/anatomy.htm 
                 *** 



911 Top 500 Questions New - Updated
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rense.com 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 

  911 Top 500 Questions
  New - Updated
  From Nico Haupt
  nicohaupt@yahoo.com
  http://www.ourDNA.org
  5-8-2
 

          911 - THE BASIC QUESTIONS 
          1. Why didn't jets intercept the airliners since they 
          had numerous warnings of terrorist attacks? 
          2. Why did Ashcroft stop flying commercial, citing an 
          unidentified "threat" in July 2001? 
          3. Why were there no photos or videos of the Pentagon 
          plane? 
          4. Why didn't the Secret Service hustle Dubya out of 
          the classroom? 
          5. Where was George H. W. Bush at the time of the 
          attacks? 
          6. Why did passengers or crewmembers on three of the 
          flights all use the term boxcutters? 
          7. Where are the flight recorders? 
          8. Why were the FISA warrants discontinued? 
          9. How did Bush see the first plane crash on live 
          camera? 
          10 Why was security meeting scheduled for 
          9/11cancelled by WTC management on 9/10? 
          11. How did they come up with the "culprits" so 
          quickly? 
          12. How did they find the terrorist's cars at the 
          airports so quickly? 
          13. Why did Shrub dissolve the Bin Laden Task Force? 
          14. Why the strange pattern of debris from Flight 93? 
          15. Why was no plane seen at the Pentagon? 
          16. How extensive was the relationship between the 
          Taliban, the ISI and the CIA? 
          17. What exactly was the role of Henry Kissinger at 
          UNOCAL? 
          18. When was it decided to cancel building a pipeline 
          from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan? 
          19. When was the decision made to send the FEMA to New 
          York? 
          20. Why did FEMA spokesman Tom Kenney tell Dan Rather 
          he was in New York on Sept. 10? 
          21. Why did the FBI in 1996 close the files to 
          investigate Osama bin Laden's relatives in Washington? 
          22. Why did .Bush stop inquiries into terrorist 
          connections of the Bin Laden family in early 2001? 
          23. Who made the decision to have John O'Neill stop 
          investigating Al-qeada accounts? 
          24. Who gave the decision to give him a security job 
          at the World Trade Center? 
          25. Did John O'Neill meet anyone of the FEMA in the 
          night of September 10th? 
          26. What about media reports that hijackers bought 
          tickets for flights scheduled after Sept. 11? 
          27. Why did none of the 19 hijackers appeared on the 
          passenger lists? 
          28. Why would devout Muslims frequent bars, drink 
          alcoholic beverages and leave their bibles? 
          29. Why would the hijackers use credit cards and allow 
          drivers licenses with photos to be zeroxed? 
          30. Why did the hijackers force passengers to call 
          relatives? 
          31. How did the hijackers change the flight plan 
          without law enforcement or the military try to stop 
          them? 
          32. Which hijacker's passport was found in the WTC 
          rubble? Who found it and what time? 
          33. How could the FBI distinguish between "regular" 
          Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights? 
          34. Why was there not one "innocent" Muslim on board 
          any of these flights? 
          35. Did someone go through the passenger lists looking 
          for Muslim names and label them as hijackers? 
          MOHAMMED ATTA 
          36. Did the Florida police provide information that 
          Atta was searched because of 1)an expired Visa, 2) 
          driving a car without a license, 3) because of an 
          incident at Miami Airport? 
          37. Why did Atta leave his bag at the airport and the 
          employees didn't put it on board? 
          38. Who found his bag? How can we be sure it it was 
          his bag? 
          39. Why did Atta place a video "how to fly planes", a 
          uniform and his last will into his bag, knowing that 
          he would commit suicide? 
          40. Why did Atta leave his drivers license in a rental 
          car? 
          41. When did Atta train on a flight simulator? 
          42. Did Atta leave the US while in training and then 
          return? 
          43. Why did Atta decide to study at Opa Locka, a 
          famous hub of 6 Navy training bases and includes 
          government partners like U.S. Coast Guard Air Station, 
          Police (Miami-Dade) Aviation Unit? 
          44. Why was Atta allowed to study since he was stopped 
          by the police for driving without a license and also 
          for violating his visa? 
          THE BLACK BOXES AND CRASH VIDEO 
          45. Why were the Black Boxes never recovered ? 
          46. Why didn't the FBI release the air traffic 
          controller's protocols? 
          47. Why did the FBI not release the Flight Data 
          Recorder info? 
          48. Who video-recorded the first plane hitting the 
          tower? Why did he disappear from the media? 
          THE HIJACKERS 
          49. How did the FBI receive a tip from a passenger who 
          boarded a different plane and reached his destination 
          safely that he had a confrontation with two ME men at 
          the Logan airport in Boston? 
          50. Who tipped the FBI to storm the Westin Hotel in 
          Boston on September 12th? 
          51. Where did the photos of all 19 hijackers come 
          from? 
          52. How were all hijackers identified just 2 days 
          after the attack? 
          53. Why did all 19 names not appear on the passenger 
          list 2 days after the hijacker list was released? 
          54. Why do none of the names appear on the passenger 
          lists UA and AA gave to CNN? 
          55. How could the hijackers disable the defense 
          systems? 
          56. Why did the FBI ignore Bin Laden's family, who 
          left the United States without further investigation 
          57. What about the supposed hijackers who are still 
          alive? 
          58. Was there a reason to change the list of the 
          original 19 hijackers? 
          59. What happened to Ayub Ali Khan and Mohammed Jaweed 
          Azmath, who have been in jail since 
          September 2001, because of possession of box cutters 
          on a train?Who gave the tip to arrest them? 
          60. Why did it take 4 months before Ramsi Binalschibhs 
          name was mentioned, since he was a good friend of 
          Mohammad Atta and lived in his apartment in Hamburg? 
          61. Why did it take 4 months until December 11 to 
          charge Zacarias Moussaoui for the 9/11 attacks when 
          his case was known worldwide for months, but not 
          mentioned in the American media? 
          62. Whatever happened with Lotfi Raissi, who was 
          arrested in UK for teaching the terrorist pilots? 
          63. What is the current status of the investigation of 
          Mamoun Darkazanli Import-Export-Company in Hamburg and 
          Al Taqwa Management Organisation in Lugano? 
          64. Why was Richard Reid able to enter the Paris 
          airport twice and who paid for his hotel? 
          65. Who hired Zacarias Masspoui to learn how to fly 
          passenger jets in the United States? 
          66. Why did the FBI or CIA fail to interrogate him 
          between August and December 2001? 
          BIN LADEN 
          67. Did the CIA monitor Bin Laden in 1998 with the 
          help of 15 Afghan agents, paid $1,000/ month? 
          68. Where are these agents? Was Johnny "Mike" Spann 
          one? Was John Walker Lindh one? 
          69. Is an Afghan agent a member of the ISI? Is an 
          Afghan agent working for Bin Laden? 
          70. When was the first time Tenet mentioned the 
          Al-Quaeda group to any member of the Senate? 
          71. Why did the Pentagon release a new video version 
          or translation of the Bin Laden Home video? 
          72. Why it was released only 8 hours after translation 
          by the German magazine MONITOR on December ? 
          73. Why were the four translators prior US-Government 
          workers? 
          74. When was the Bin Laden Home Video found and who 
          found it? 
          75. Who found the video if Northern Alliance and US 
          troops had not yet arrived in Kandahar or Jahalabad? 
          76. Does the timestamp on the Bin Laden video indicate 
          that it was found two weeks after it was produced? 
          77. Why was the public not informed who found the 
          video and when? 
          78. Why according to MONITOR magazine, were the most 
          controversial statements translated incorrectly? 
          79. Why was the video released? 
          80. Who gave the final decision to release it? 
          81. Why is the Bin Laden video of June 2001 in which 
          he praised the attack, available on the Internet? 
          82. What about Bin Laden's statements on Al-Jazeera in 
          June 2001 about the bombing of USS Cole, which are 
          similar to the statements on the November 2001 home 
          video? 
          83. Why did Bin Laden state in Umman Magazine in Sept. 
          2001, that he was not involved in the WTC? 
          84. Is Bin Laden still on the payroll of the CIA or 
          ISI? 
          85. Did the Bin Laden Group Inc. help build ToraBora 
          with the CIA? 
          86. What was the purpose of the meeting with General 
          Pervez Musharraf in May 2001? 
          87. Why was a statement released that Al-Khalifa bin 
          Laden, who is not the mother of Bin Laden, had a 
          telephone call with Bin Laden on September 9, rather 
          than Alia Ghanem, his mother? Why did Alia Ghanem say 
          she did not believe he planned the attack? 
          ANTHRAX AND MICROBIOLOGIST DEATHS 
          100. What happened on September 18th, when an employee 
          of Batelle Memorial Institute was involved in a 
          so-called anthrax hoax on that day? Was he arrested? 
          101. Why did the investigation of that case begin in 
          December 2001? 
          102. What was in the memo of Dr. Leonard Horowitz, a 
          public health consumer advocate and author of "Death 
          in the Air" on October 1, 2001, almost two weeks 
          before the first anthrax letter was sent from Trenton 
          to the American media building in Boca Raton? 
          103.What about his letter of Nov. 13 in which he 
          claimed that BAYER is behind the anthrax infections? 
          104. Did US BioDefense laboratories send the 
          anthrax-laced letters to get a new budget for 
          research? 
          105. What about the statement of former UN-weapons 
          inspector of Iraq, Richard Spertzel, who told ABC, 
          "...he knows only five scientists in the USA who would 
          be in the situation to produce such a fine, highly 
          developed spore material"? 
          106. Why did it take 48 hours to inform Bob Stevens 
          that he had anthrax? 
          107. Why were envelopes never found near Bob Stevens, 
          Amelie Lundgren and Mia Nguyen? 
          108. How come Microsoft got a hoax anthrax letter from 
          Malaysia on the same day that President Bush said 
          Malaysia might be one of the next targets of the 
          United States? 
          109. Why did the FBI never investigate the case Don 
          Wiley, a Bioscientist who disappeared 11/13/01? 
          110. Why did the FBI begin to investigate after his 
          body was found on December 22, 300 miles away? 
          Was there an investigation at the military hydro plant 
          where workers found him? 
          Why did the media write different versions about how, 
          when and where he was found? 
          Why did the police report change 2 months later from 
          suicide to an accident? 
          111. What was the goal of Bioport in 1997? 
          112.Did development of anti-anthrax vaccines begin in 
          1998? 
          113.When did Bioport decide to produce anthrax 
          vaccines? 
          114. Was it before or after Sept. 1998 that Admiral 
          Crowe was put in charge of investigations of the 
          August 7, 1998 bombings of Embassy Nairobi and Embassy 
          Dar Es Salaam? 
          115. Did the schedule for developing anti-anthrax 
          vaccines begin starting in 1998? 
          116. When did the US Government ask Bayer for help in 
          developing a vaccine? 
          117. When did Bayer start sending the vaccines to the 
          U.S.? 
          118. When did Bayer double production of the vaccines? 
          119. Was the death of Vladimir Pasechnik investigated? 
          He was former director of the Institute of Ultra Pure 
          Biochemical Preparations of the Soviet bio-warfare 
          establishment Biopreparat in November 2001? 
          120. How are the deaths of scientists Robert M. 
          Schwartz, Dr. Benito Que and Set Van Nguyen explained 
          since all occurred in the same month? Is Set van 
          Nguyen related to the anthrax victim Mia Nguyen? 
          121. What about the death of Nancy Sonnenfeld 
          (FEMA-Wife)? 
          122. Why was the NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife 
          examining Anthrax in August 2000? 
          123. Do any employees in Trenton have the same 
          handwriting as printed on the Anthrax envelopes? 
          124. Is it just a coincidence that the laboratory is 
          also based in Trenton? 
          125. Did the FBI ever ask Fort Detrick to examine 
          anthrax spores? 
          126. What about the list of 15-20 labs (maintained by 
          Barbara Rosenzweig) who used Fort Detrick spores? 
          127. Does the CIA have spores different from those at 
          Fort Detrick? 
          128. Why did Tommy Thompson, The Secretary of the 
          Department of Health and Human Services, 
          and other Bush cabinet members meet secretly (i.e. 
          illegally) in Oct. 2001 with officials of the 
          Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America 
          (PhRMA) to develop plans for their Emergency 
          Preparedness Task Force? 
          129. Why did he decide on October 25, 2001 to ask 
          Congress for another $500 million to produce Acambis's 
          smallpox vaccine? 
          130. Why did it take 4.5 hours until Jean Marie 
          Malecki , Director Palm Beach County Health 
          Department, picked up the phone for employees of the 
          AMI-Building, Boca Raton. This is where editor Bob 
          Stevens got anthrax. Why did she wait two days before 
          she visited that building again? 
          131. Did Walter Gilbert, Director Myriad Genetics ever 
          get official permission from relatives of those killed 
          at WTC to examine their DNA? 
          FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES 
          150. Why did General Mahmud Ahmad, former head of the 
          ISI quit his position? 
          151. Why did retaliation against the Taliban begin the 
          day he stepped down? 
          152. Who in the ISI paid $100.000 to Mohammad Atta? 
          153. Why does Ahmad think that another secret service 
          was involved in the WTC attack? 
          Which Secret Service was he referring to? Did other 
          ISI official's believe that? Did officials of the CIA 
          believe that? Did some officials of the Mossad believe 
          that? 
          154. What was the purpose of Ahmad's visit to 
          Washington on 9/11? 
          155. Who told Russian Foreign Minister Ivanov to abort 
          an air strike against Afghanistan in May 2000? 
          156. Did Russian intelligence notify the CIA in 2001 
          that 25 terrorist pilots had been training for suicide 
          missions, as reported in the Russian press? 
          KISSINGER 
          1. What did Kissinger mean that an "outside threat 
          from beyond", a "world government" and "individual 
          rights" who are "willingly relinquished for the 
          guarantee of their well-being granted", what you 
          mentioned in 1991 on a Bilderberg Conference? 
          2. What was his role at UNOCAL? 
          3. Is he in contact with representatives of these 
          companies or institutions: 
          4. What did he discuss at the Bilderberg meeting last 
          year in May 2001? 
          5. What was the purpose of his meeting with Moscow 
          Mayor Yuri Luzhkov in July 2001? 
          6. Why does he write in "Toward a New Diplomacy for 
          the 21st Century" that America doesn't need a Foreign 
          Policy? 
          7. When was the last time Henry Kissinger met 
          US-Ambassador in Pakistan, Robert Oakley? 
          THE PURCHASE OF AIRLINE PUT OPTIONS 
          1. Is it true that the CIA is in possession of PROMIS 
          software? 
          2. What is the purpose of PROMIS? 
          3. Did A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, CIA, own any stocks of 
          United Airlines, American Airlines, Merrill Lynch, 4. 
          Morgan Stanley, AXA Re (insurance) which owns 25% of 
          American Airlines, and Munich Re.? 
          5. What is his connection to Alex Brown, Deutsche 
          Bank? 
          6. Did he give any insider information about to George 
          Tenet, CIA? 
          7. Who was the investor who purchased 2,000 UAL put 
          options between August and September 11, 2001? 
          8. Did Deutsche Bank-Alex Brown own any stocks of UA, 
          AA, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AXA Re (insurance) 
          which owns 25% of American Airlines, and Munich Re? 
          9. What about the 2,500 UA-contracts which were "split 
          into 500 chunks each, directing each order to 
          different U.S. exchanges around the country 
          simultaneously." on August 10, 2001? 
          10. Did Deutsche purchase UAL options in August 2001? 
          11. Why did DB-AB purchase 4,744 put options on United 
          Air Lines stock as opposed to only 396 call s on 
          September 6-7? What was the purpose of doing that? 
          12. What is the connection to Wally Kromgaard? 
          13. Did Deutsche Bank or Wally Kromgaard purchase 
          4,516 put options on American Airlines as compared to 
          748 call options on September 10? 
          14. What was the reason of Mayo Shattuck III 
          re-asssignment on September 15th? 
          THE TALIBAN AND THE CARPET OF GOLD.. 
          1. When was the last time they met any representatives 
          of the US-Government? 
          2. What was the purpose of these meetings? 
          3. Do the Taliban know Karl E. Inderfurth and State 
          Department counterterrorism chief Michael Sheehan? 
          4. Do they know which US-Representative said in 
          February 2001: "Either you accept our offer of a 
          carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of 
          bombs"? 
          5. When was the last time the Taliban was in touch 
          with this representative? 
          6. Did Abdul Haq, the former Mujahedin leader executed 
          Sept 2001 by the Taliban, decide in Winter 2000 to 
          attack the Taliban? 
          7. Did production of opium in Afghanistan fall from 
          3276 tonnes in 2000 to 185 tonnes in 2001? 
          GLOBAL HAWK TECHNOLOGY 
          1. Was Global Hawk technology able to remotelycontrol 
          unmanned planes in 1999 for 27 hours? 
          2. Did Northrop-Grumman use Global Hawk technology in 
          the war in Afghanistan since October 2001? 
          3. What is the purpose of unmanned technology? 
          4. Is Northrup in contact with any engineers of 
          Boeing? 
          5. Did Northrup install Global Hawk technology in a 
          commercial airplane? 
          CARRIER AND TROOP MOVEMENTS BEFORE SEPT 11 
          1. Did two U.S. carrier battle groups arrive in the 
          Gulf of Arabia just off the Pakistani coast before 
          9/11? 
          2. Did 17,000 U.S. troops join more than 23,000 NATO 
          troops in Egypt for Operation 'Bright Star' on 9/11? 
          What was the purpose of both of these operations? 
          BIOCHEMICAL WARFARE 
          1. When did Tommy Franks learn that he would use 
          Thermobarics in ToraBora? 
          2. Does he know if it had been tested on December 12 
          in Nevada? 
          3. Who told Franks that Bin Laden might hide in 
          ToraBora? 
          4. Is the main purpose of Thermobarics to destroy 
          buried bio and chemical stocks? 
          5. Was Thermobarics developed for the purpose to use 
          one day in Iraq? 
          6. When was the first time Franks used Thermobarics? 
          Was it before or after the announcement of the end of 
          ABM Treaty on December 11? 
          7. When did the US decide to use B61-11, the "nuclear 
          version" of its "conventional" BLU-113 counterpart? 
          8. Why has the NSA destroyed data collected on 
          Americans or US companies since the Sept. 11 attacks? 
          ABORTED ATTEMPTS TO GET BIN-LADEN 
          1. Why did Clinton abort an attack on Bin Laden in 
          October 1999? 
          2. Who was responsible for that operation? 
          3. Why was the operation put on hold? 
          4. Why did Musharraf halt a covert operation to attack 
          Bin Laden in October 1999? 
          5. Why did the GOP in Congress stop almost every move 
          Clinton made against terrorism? They refused to 
          believe reports and pass necessary legislation. In 
          1996 Clinton proposed a very extensive anti-terrorism 
          regulation. 
          RICHARD REID 
          1. Who hired Richard Reid to threaten a passenger 
          plane in Paris? 
          2. Who did he send an email to in Pakistan? 
          3. Has he ever been in touch with the ISI or CIA? 
          4. Did he know the difference between an explosive and 
          a detonator? 
          5. How many ounces did he have in his shoes? 
          6. What size are his shoes? 
          7. Who build or prepared his shoes? 
          JOHN WALKER LINDH 
          1. Has John Walker Lindh ever been in touch with the 
          CIA? 
          2. Did he ever work for the CIA? 
          3. Who arrested him in 2001? 
          4. Why didn't he escape in the tumult to nearby 
          Masar-e-Sharif? 
          5. Who hired his lawyer, Richard Brohanan? Who paid 
          his lawyer? 
          6. Why didn't he go to Guantanamo Bay? 
          DICK CHENEY 
          1. When did Cheney stop working for Halliburton? 
          2. Is he still in possession of any Halliburton stock? 
          3. Is he still in contact with Halliburton? 
          4. Was Halliburton invited to an oil conference in May 
          2002? 
          5. Does Cheney know when that meeting was planned? 
          6. Did Cheney have influence concerning Halliburton 
          contracts with the Pentagon? 
          7. What exactly did Cheney decide to do on September 
          11th? 
          8. Did he speak with an Air Force Commander or Lt. 
          Gen. Charles F. Wald on that day? 
          9. When did he inform the president about the hijacked 
          airplanes on September 11? 
          10. Who called the White House on September 11 at 9:30 
          PM about a possible threat? 
          11. Why was no air security at the White House or the 
          Pentagon at 9:30 PM? 
          12. When and who gave the approval to evacuate the 
          White House at 9:45 PM? 
          13. What was the purpose of a meeting with Indian 
          opposition leader Sonia Gandhi in June 2001 about a 
          multimillion-dollar debt owed to Enron from a major 
          energy project in Indian Power Plants? 
          14. When was the last time Cheney spoke with anyone 
          from ENRON? 
          COLIN POWELL 
          1. What was the role of Colin Powell? 
          2. Who decided to give $43 million in aid to the 
          Taliban regime in May 2001? 
          3. Did he know that production of opium in Afghanistan 
          fell from 3276 tonnes in 2000 to 185 in 2001? 
          4. What was the purpose of his decision to treat the 
          Taliban prisoners as War Prisoners? Is this decision 
          in any way related to media reports 2 days earlier 
          that Powell may have been involved in negotiations 
          with Indian Power Plants? 
          5. What was the purpose of his short trip to Latin 
          America on September 11? 
          6. Who decided that he fly to Latin America on that 
          day? 
          7. Why would someone threaten him in Afghanistan on 
          January 17, 2002 as Newsweek reported? 
          8. What was the purpose of Powell meeting with India's 
          foreign minister on April 6, 2001? 
          9. Did Enron or Cheney ask Powell to help collect a 
          $64 million debt on an Indian plant project? 
          GEORGE H.W. BUSH 
          1. When was the last time George H.W. Bush traveled to 
          South Arabia on behalf of the Carlyle Group? 
          2. What was the purpose of that meeting? 
          THOMAS WHITE 
          1. Is Thomas White still in contact with ENRON? 
          2. Did his contact at anytime influence his decisions? 
          3. Does he still own ENRON stocks? 
          DELMART VREELAND 
          1. Did Vreeland warn Canadian Intelligence in May 2001 
          about possible terrorist attacks on New York and the 
          Pentagon? 
          2. Did he place the warning in an envelope while in 
          prison in Toronto, Canada? 
          3. Where did he get his information? 
          4. Whom did he give the envelope to? 
          5. Why was he placed in jail? 
          SAUDI-BINLADIN-GROUP.COM 
          1.Was the domain created on September 11th, 2000? 
          2. Who paid for that domain? 
          3. Are they also owners of Iridium Satellites? 
          4. When did they end contact with relatives of the 
          Bush family? 
          THE CARLYLE GROUP 
          1. When was the last time George H.W. Bush traveled to 
          Saudi Arabia on behalf of the privately owned Carlyle 
          Group, the 11th largest defense contractor in the 
          U.S.? 
          2. What was the purpose of that meeting? 
          3. When did he resign from Carlyle Group? 
          4. Is he still in touch with any of their 
          representatives? 
          STEPHEN LANDER, Director MI5 
          1. Did Lander monitor a phone conversation between 
          Zacarias Moussaoui and Richard Reid in Dec. 2000? 
          2. What did Lander tell representatives of the CIA 
          about Zacarias Moussaoui? 
          3. Why did he stop monitoring Djamel Beghal, member of 
          Takfir-wal-Hijra (financed by Osama bin Laden) in 
          August 2001? 
          BIN LADEN IN DUBAI 
          1. Did Bin Laden in July 2001 enter an American 
          hospital in Dubai? 
          2. Did he arrive on July 4, 2001 on a flight from 
          Qetta, Pakistan to American Hospital? 
          3. Was he at the hospital July 4-11, 2001? 
          4. Did Bernard Koval, CEO of American Hospital, ever 
          speak with Doctor Terry Callaway about that visit? 
          5. Why did he change his statements about this story 
          not being true and that he "asked around"? 
          6. What is the difference between Continuous 
          Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Continuous Cycling
          Peritoneal Dialysis? 
          7. Did Koval know Larry Stevens? 
          8. Can Koval explain why Richard Labeviere, author of 
          "Terror Dollars" (about illegal Al-Quaeda accounts), 
          wrote the story about Osama Bin Laden's kidney 
          operation? 
          GEORGE W. BUSH 
          1. What exactly happened on September 11 and at what 
          time was President Bush informed? 
          2. Why was President Bush scheduled to visit a school 
          in Florida? 
          3. Who scheduled the time of the visit? 
          4. When exactly did Bush learn about the first crash 
          into the WTC? 
          5. How could he have seen that on TV? 
          6. Why didn't he interrupt his school meeting as soon 
          as he learned of the first plane crash? 
          7. Did Bush ever wonder how Bin Laden was able to hear 
          the first plane crash live on the radio? 
          8. Which radio station he was listening to? 
          9. Can Bush explain how Bin Laden's Home Video was 
          found only two weeks after it was produced? 
          10. Why did Bush decide to release Bin Laden's Home 
          Video? 
          11. What is the purpose of the Western Hemisphere 
          Institute for Security Cooperation (WHISC) in Fort 
          Benning, Georgia, where terrorists have been trained 
          for undercover agents in South America? 
          Bush stated "if any government sponsors the outlaws 
          and killers of innocents, they have become outlaws and 
          murderers themselves". So what does he think about 
          Fort Benning? 
          12. What is the role of Zalmay Khalilzad (former 
          UNOCAL) in the National Security Council ? 
          13. What is the current role of Zalmay Khalilzad 
          (former UNOCAL) in Afghanistan? 
          14. When was Bush's last contact with anyone from 
          ENRON? 
          15. Why was China admitted to the WTO on September 13 
          after 15 years of unsuccessful attempts? 
          16. Why did Bush postpone the release of Ronald 
          Reagan's records? 
          17. How does Bush feel about the need to investigate 
          the CIA's mistakes? 
          18. Does Bush agree with senators John McCain, Joseph 
          I. Lieberman, Porter J. Goss, former C.I.A. 
          clandestine case officer and a Florida Republican, 
          Richard C. Shelby and Ron Paul, US Congressman, who 
          want an investigation and have said "Secret government 
          is winning out over open government"? 
          19. Did he know before he left his hotel that morning 
          on the way to the school that the 1st tower had been 
          hit?ABC news reported that morning that he was asked 
          by reporters if he was aware of events in NYC and he 
          answered yes. If so, why did he later say he first 
          heard of it was when he was at the school? 
          20. Why did Bush continue to sit in that classroom 
          reading to children when he should have been 
          conferring with his advisors? 
          21. Why did Bush say that he and Card initially 
          thought it was an accident involving a small plane? 
          22. Given all the information sources available to the 
          POTUS and his staff how could his people not have 
          known the kind of plane involved? 
          23. Why didn't they know at this point, as did the FAA 
          and NORAD, that aircraft were hijacked? 
          The Batallion Chief in the 9/11 video was seen and 
          heard asking for military backup immediately after the 
          building was hit. 
          24.How come the NYFD knew it was terrorism right away 
          but the POTUS and his aides just calmly went about 
          their business? 
          TONY BLAIR 
          1. Were 25,000 British troops and the largest British 
          Armada since the Falkland Islands War, part of 
          Operation 'Essential Harvest' pre-positioned in Oman, 
          the closest point on the Arabian Peninsula to Pakistan 
          before September 11, 2001? 
          2. When did he begin to place SIS-Special Forces in 
          Afghanistan? Why? 
          THE SUN-SENTINEL 
          1. Did Gloria Irish own unit 1504 at the Delray 
          Racquet Club, 755 Dotterel? 
          2. Did she rent that property to Hamza Alghamdi in 
          August 2001? 
          3. Why did the media not report about a connection of 
          the Sun-Sentinel and the hijackers? 
          4. Why did it first appear that the hijackers had 
          something to do with the anthrax attacks? 
          5. Why has this connection or coincidence never 
          appeared in the media again? 
          6. What was the connection between husband Michael 
          Irish (SunSentinel) and Bob Stevens (who died from 
          Anthrax)? 
          WARNINGS 
          1. When did Vladimir Putin warn the CIA about a 
          possible terrorist attack and what was their reaction? 
          2. What was the purpose of the meeting between 
          Christina Rocca, director of Asian affairs at the 
          State Department and the Taliban ambassador Mollah 
          Abdul Salam Zaeef in Islamabad in August 2001? 
          3. Why did she oversee the delivery of Stinger 
          missiles in the 80s to Afghan mujaheddin? 
          4. Did Walid Arkeh in Seminole County jail inform the 
          FBI in August 2001 about an attack on America? What 
          was the reaction of the FBI? 
          5. Why did Dr. Jeffrey Starr, U.S. department of 
          defense, visit Tajikistan in Jan 2001? 
          6. When did Jean-Claude Cousseran, Director DGSE , 
          French Secret Service inform the CIA about terrorist 
          attacks on America? What was their reaction? 
          7. What does he know about the monitoring of Djamel 
          Beghal, member of Takfir-wal-Hijra (financed by Osama 
          bin Laden) and Kamel Daoudi? Did he ever inform the 
          CIA about that? And when? 
          8. When did Italian Deputy Prime Minister Gianfranco 
          Fini inform the CIA about a possible attack on the 
          American president "with the use of an airplane"? What 
          was their reaction? 
          9. When did President Mubarak, Egypt, inform the CIA 
          about a possible attack on America with an "airplane 
          stuffed with explosives"? What was their reaction? 
          10. When did Efraim Halevy , Director of Mossad since 
          1998 (unconfirmed) inform the CIA about a possible 
          attack with "200 terrorists" on America? What was 
          their reaction? 
          11. Is it true he warned Ariel Sharon not to travel to 
          New York on September 11 to speak at a festival? 
          12. Did a caller to Loxley Banks, Director Radio 
          Cayman Islands talk show, give several warnings of an 
          imminent attack on the U.S on Sept. 3 -10? 
          13. The London Times reported that someone from the 
          FAA warned Salman Rushdie not to travel to the United 
          States on September 3rd? If this is true, who was it? 
          14. Did the FBI investigate the two men who met 
          Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi in Harry's Bar at 
          the Helmsley Hotel in Manhattan on September 8, 2001? 
          15. Who does Abdullah Abdullah (Northern Alliance) 
          believe killed Commander Ahmad Shah Massoud on 
          September 9, 2001? 
          16. When and why did he decide to attack Kabul on 
          September 11 at 5:30 PM? 
          17. When did he decide to invade Masar-i-Scharif 
          18. Did the CIA helped him provoke a tumult? 
          19. Did he ever meet John Walker Lindh? 
          20. Why was Major John Kenny, Commander Wright 
          Patterson Air Base, Dayton placedon high alert on 
          September 10? Did he inform companies in Dayton to 
          shutdown their offices? 
          21. Why was Colonel William M. Dietrick , Commander 
          Defense Language Institute in Garrison, Monterey on 
          high alert on September 10? 
          22. Why did one of Kenneth (Ken) Weinbrecht (President 
          SAMS ) executives say on September 10, that he was a 
          'Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to 
          target US forces and make it look like a 
          Palestinian/Arab act.'" 
          23. Did Jean-Louis Bruguiere, French anti-terrorism, 
          inform the CIA on September 10 about a possible 
          terrorist attack? If so, what was their reaction? 
          24. Why did Atta and hijacker Abdulaziz Alomari checke 
          into a Portland, Maine motel (unidentified) on 
          September 10? 
          25. Why was the Portland, Airport, according to 
          eye-witnesses, in full charge of more military 
          officials and soldiers than usual, weeks before 
          September 11, 2001? 
          26. Why, as the San Francisco Chronicle reported, was 
          Mayor Brown warned to be "cautious in your travel" the 
          night of September 10? Who warned him? 
          27. Why did Alex Diamandis, Odigo Vice President of 
          Sales and Marketing, receive a warning on his 
          messenger service about a possible attack on America 
          on September 11, 2001? At which time? 
          28. When did Dr.August Hanning , President BND 
          (Bundesnachrichtendienst Germany) inform the CIA that 
          "Middle Eastern terrorists are 'planning to hijack 
          commercial aircraft ?" What was their reaction? 
          Did he allow an Iranian prisoner in Hamburg call to 
          the CIA in Summer 2001 about an attack on America? 
          What was their reaction? 
          AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL/GLOBAL HAWK 
          1. Why did Kenneth Waldie, Stanley Hall, Herbert Homer 
          and Peter Gay of Raytheon travel on Sept. 11? 2. 2. 
          Can Global Hawk technology be used for at least 27 
          hours? 
          3. Is Global Hawk technology used in commercial 
          airplanes? 
          4. Did Danielle O'Brien, air traffic controller, 
          inform another air traffic control center about a 
          plane traveling fast southwest of Dulles after 
          spotting it 8:18 AM on September 11? 
          5. Who was informed and what happened? 
          THE PENNSYLVANIA CRASH 
          1. Why didn't Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air 
          Force try to reach the airplanes in NYC (7 minutes 
          time for McGuire AFB in New Jersey ) and at the 
          Pentagon (10 minutes time)? 
          2. Did Roche ever try to shutdown the plane in 
          Pennsylvania? 
          3. Can Roche explain why magazines of that plane were 
          found 20 miles away from the crash? 
          Andrews AFB is 13 miles away. He had one hour and 
          fifteen minutes to respond to the plane that hit the 
          Pentagon. What happened during that time? 
          4. Can he explain why many ear- and eye witnesses, 
          including workers of the road construction company New 
          Enterprise saw or heard F-16 jets ? 
          5. Why did President Bush say only one week later that 
          he tried to shutdown that plane? 
          6. Who gave that decision? 
          DEFENSE ALERTS AND MOVEMENTS 
          1. Why did George Bush leave Barksdale Air Force Base 
          aboard Air Force One and flew to an Air Force base in 
          Nebraska on 1:48 PM on September 11 and returned to 
          Washington at 4:30 PM? 
          2. What exactly did Donald Rumsfeld do that day before 
          he arrived at the Pentagon around 3:55 PM? 
          3. How did Rumsfeld know at 5:30 PM on September 11 
          that the plane in Pennsylvania could have been headed 
          for one of three possible targets: Camp David, the 
          White House or the U.S. Capitol building? 
          4. Can he explain why early media reports told us that 
          no squadrons of combat-ready fighter jets have been at 
          Andrews and later changed their reports that they 
          haven't been on high alert only? 
          5. Why was Air Force Lt. Col. Vic Warzinski, another 
          Pentagon spokesman, so sure on September 11 that 
          aircraft was coming your way? 
          6. What did the D.C. Air National Guard in Washington 
          do on September 11? 
          7. Can he explain what those 3 fighters did from 
          9:40AM until 9:55AM when they finally turned towards 
          Flight 93 and were 60 miles out at 10:06am? 
          8. Can he explain why Air Traffic Controllers in a 
          Nashua Telegraph article did report an F-16 was 
          circling Flight 93 and was in visual range at the time 
          of crash? 
          9. Can he confirm a witness report that National Guard 
          F-16's have been at Hancock field in Syracuse NY in 
          the air early that morning before 9AM? 
          10. How could the hijackers know how to disable 
          defense systems? 
          11. What was the official reason that fighters of the 
          305th Air Wing, McGuire Air Force Base, NJ did not 
          intercept the 2nd hijacked plane in NYC? This would 
          have been possible within 7 minutes after 8:48 AM 
          12. Why did none of the 459th Aircraft Squadron 
          (Andrews AFB) fighters intercept the plane which 
          crashed into the Pentagon? Andrews AFB is 10 miles 
          from Washington DC. 
          13. Col. Ken McClellan, Air Force spokesman said on 
          September 11, that Mohammad Atta attended the 
          International Officer's School at Maxwell/Gunter Air 
          Force Base in Montgomery, and was seen by 
          eye-witnesses? What was McClellan doing there? Why did 
          he later deny the report? 
          14. Why did he decide not to shutdown ECHELON base Bad 
          Aibling in Germany as planned for 2002? 
          15. What is the reason that none of any Air Force 
          fighters reached the hijacked plane in time? 
          16. Many eye- and witnesses think that the plane in 
          Pennsylvania was shot down. What is the scientific 
          explanation why the magazine of the airplane was found 
          many miles away? 
          17. Why did Jack Kelly, idefense.com, inform USA Today 
          only 12 minutes after the first crash (8:48AM), that 
          terror groups using Web encryption may have been 
          responsible? And why was he so sure before the second 
          crash at 9:03 PM? 
          18. Did Kelly serve with the U.S. government where he 
          managed several significant programs for the 
          information warfare and intelligence communities? 
          19. Did Joseph J. Esposito, Chief of NYPD try to 
          contact the Pentagon at 9:06 AM on September 11? What 
          was their reaction? 
          10. Why didn't General Elwood "Pete" Quesada of the 
          FAA inform President Bush between 8:15 and 9:05 about 
          four simultaneously hijacked planes? Who did he inform 
          and what was their reaction? 
          THE WTC COLLAPSE 
          1. What does Nicholas Scoppetta of FDNY know about the 
          latest reports of the WTC destruction? 
          2. Can he explain why many witnesses saw and heard 
          more than two explosions in the WTC? 
          3. Can he explain why both Twin Towers and Building 7 
          collapsed in that way? 
          4. Can he explain why a gas tank was in Building 7? 
          5. Can he explain why there were no passengers in the 
          subway under the WTC? 
          6. Can he explain why there was no guard at the gold 
          reservoir under the WTC? 
          7. Why did Dr. Jeffrey P. Koplan, Director CDC 
          prepare, as CNN reported, emergency-response teams on 
          September 11 at 11:16 PM? 
          MISCELLANEOUS 
          1. When did Dr.August Hanning , President BND 
          (Bundesnachrichtendienst Germany) inform the CIA that 
          "Middle Eastern terrorists are 'planning to hijack 
          commercial aircraft ?" What was their reaction? 
          Did he allow an Iranian prisoner in Hamburg call to 
          the CIA in Summer 2001 about an attack on America? 
          What was their reaction? 
          2. When did Tayseer Allouni , Kabul correspondent 
          Al-Jazeera, receive his first video from Bin Laden? 
          Can he explain why the first video on October 7 2001, 
          the day of the retaliation, looked like it was 
          recorded in the morning? 
          3. Did Tom Simmons (former U.S. Ambassador to 
          Pakistan), Karl Inderfurth (former Assistant Secretary 
          of State for South Asian affairs) and Lee Coldren 
          (former State Department expert on South Asia) decide 
          or announce in a July 2001 meeting that an attack was 
          planned on the Taliban in October 2001? 
          4. Why did Ms. Barbara Bodine, US ambassador to Yemen 
          stop John O'Neill from investigating Al-Quaeda 
          accounts in July 2001? 
          5. Did Niaz Niak, former Pakistani Foreign Secretary 
          say in mid July 2001 that the USA planned military 
          action against Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban? 
          6. Did Hameed Gul, retired Pakistani general of 
          Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence, say that a 
          secret service was involved in the attack on America? 
          7. Why did Tommy Thompson, The Secretary of the 
          Department of Health and Human Services, 
          and other Bush cabinet members meet secretly (i.e. 
          illegally) in Oct. 2001 with officials of the 
          Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America 
          (PhRMA) to develop plans for their Emergency 
          Preparedness Task Force? Why did he decide on October 
          25, 2001 to ask Congress for another $500 million to 
          produce Acambis's smallpox vaccine? 
          8. Why did it take 4.5 hours until Jean Marie Malecki 
          , Director Palm Beach County Health Department, picked 
          up the phone for employees of the AMI-Building, Boca 
          Raton. This is where editor Bob Stevens got anthrax. 
          Why did she wait two days before she visited that 
          building again? 
          9. Why did Mayor Guilani sell WTC rubble to India for 
          recycling and also China? Who made that decision? 
          10. What was the purpose of U.S. Ambassador Wendy 
          Chamberlain's phone call on October 10, 2001 to the 
          Pakistani oil minister? Why was she sure that a 
          previously abandoned Unocal pipeline from Turkmenistan 
          across Afghanistan to the Pakistani coast for the 
          purpose of selling oil and gas to China, was back on 
          the table in view of recent geopolitical developments? 
          11. What exactly was found on Z. Moussaoui's computer 
          after 9/11, when local agents were given a Federal 
          Intelligence Security Act (FISA) warrant, which they 
          had requested six weeks previously? 
          This ties directly into the question of the 
          administration's dealings with the Taliban, its 
          reluctance to investigate Saudi nationals, etc. 
          12. Why the attack on Cynthia McKinney for asking: 1) 
          why has there been no investigation of the 9-11 
          attack? and 2) did Bush/CIA/NSA know of it beforehand, 
          and allow it to happen? 
          13. Why is the Bush administration so strongly against 
          a real investigation into the events of 9-11? 
          14. Why did the US give 43 million dollars to 
          Afghanistan back in May or June of 2001 
          15. Why did Bush toss the Hart-Rudman terror security 
          study (developed over a 2 year period) and instead 
          assign responsibility to Cheney and FEMA? 
          16. Why did Ashcroft stops flying commercial, citing 
          an unidentified "threat" in July 2001? 
          Why did the FBI and Justice not identify the form, 
          origin and time of the threat? 
          17. Why did Bush stay in Texas for the month of August 
          and Cheney in Wyoming? 
          18. Why no photos or videos of the Pentagon plane? And 
          there's not a single credible frame of film or second 
          of video of this? Also, why hasn't a similar flight 
          path graphic ever been published? 
          19. Why didn't the Secret Service hustle Dubya out of 
          the classroom a half-second after Andy Card told him, 
          "Mr. pResident, the nation is under attack"? 
          20. Why did they leave him exposed to danger for two 
          and a half minutes in the classroom and another 
          half-hour in the school before he returned to the 
          relative safety of Air Force One? 
          21. Where was George H. W. Bush at the time of the 
          attacks? 
          22. Why did passengers or crewmembers on three of the 
          flights tell people on the ground that the highjackers 
          had "box cutters"? 
          23. Where are the flight recorders? 
          24. How did they find a passport that just "happens" 
          to belong to one of the hijackers in the WTC rubble 
          and they can't locate even ONE flight recorder? 
          25. Why no investigative reporting of the Pentagon 
          scene? The photos do not show much, but then 
          photographers were not allowed, initially, to 
          photograph the scene, if I remember correctly. 
          26. Why was the series of recommendations Al Gore also 
          put together in 1996 on airport security called by 
          Republican congress "paranoid" and too harsh. Why did 
          the airline industry, lobbying against it, consider it 
          too expensive and impractical. 
          27. Why was the Hart-Rudman report on the potential 
          dangers of terrorism in the homeland. The results of 
          the research ignored by Bush? 
          28. Why were FISA warrants disallowed by Bush? 
          29. Why did the US pull the plug on Muslim websites 
          Monday September 10, 2001? 
          30. Why did the Saudi bin-Laden-group have a website 
          with a PRE-SET expiration date of Sept. 11, 2001? 
          31. Why were the bin Ladens flown out of the U.S. on 
          private jets the day after the 9/11? 
          32. Why did Cheney say that everyone in the White 
          House started taking Cipro on September 12 when the 
          first anthrax letter wasn't postmarked until September 
          18. 33. Why did Bush dissolve the Bin Laden Task 
          Force? What would have happened had this focused and 
          knowledgeable group been in place 9 months before 911? 
          34. Why was metallic debris found 8 miles from the 
          crash site of the plane that went down in Penn? They 
          said it went straight down and left a small hole in 
          the ground. If they found metallic debris from the 
          plane 8 miles away it was either shot down or a bomb 
          exploded in the plane. 
          35. Why did they not let the media or any reporters 
          take video or photos of the crash site? 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  MainPage
  http://www.rense.com



Top of Page